Muzzy's.....Thunderhead's....whatta crisis???
#11
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Katy TX USA
I recently took a 1500-pound Water Buffalo in Argentina with 125-grain Thunderheads. Broke 2 ribs that are like 2X4's and didn't lose a single blade. The broadheads stayed perfectly in tact and with some replacement blades, they were good as new. I was impressed with their durability, not to mention their effectiveness.
I'm sure Muzzy's are the same and they do cost a bit less.
Actually, for game as small as whitetail deer, there are MANY broadheads on the market that are equally effective. I like Spitfire Expandables also. They shoot great and make a helluva hole and are great for deer-sized animals. When going after bigger game like Elk, Moose, Water Buffalo, or some of the big Africa Game, broadhead choice becomes a bit more critical.
Get a good quality broadhead: Thunderhead, Spitfire, Muzzy, Satellite, and you will be fine for deer.
I'm sure Muzzy's are the same and they do cost a bit less.
Actually, for game as small as whitetail deer, there are MANY broadheads on the market that are equally effective. I like Spitfire Expandables also. They shoot great and make a helluva hole and are great for deer-sized animals. When going after bigger game like Elk, Moose, Water Buffalo, or some of the big Africa Game, broadhead choice becomes a bit more critical.
Get a good quality broadhead: Thunderhead, Spitfire, Muzzy, Satellite, and you will be fine for deer.
#12
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
From: Ridgeland MS USA
I've killed deer with both and here is my opinion.
Thunderheads-Very accurate, not very durable.
Muzzy-Very accurate, very durable.
You pick.
Hunt the thickets
Thunderheads-Very accurate, not very durable.
Muzzy-Very accurate, very durable.
You pick.
Hunt the thickets
#14
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh PA
NO crisis, but the easiest decision you will ever make. You can't be wrong with either choice. I don;t think there is a shot out there on a deer where one will significantly out perform the other.
Personally I am a thunderhead guy. I will never switch, they have never failed me. I put them through some bone too and they've held up. I don;t shoot a blistering speed bow by any means either.
Some things are true whether you believe them or not.
Personally I am a thunderhead guy. I will never switch, they have never failed me. I put them through some bone too and they've held up. I don;t shoot a blistering speed bow by any means either.
Some things are true whether you believe them or not.
#15
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Warren OH USA
No brainer here.....Muzzy, period. If the shop is out, I'll go to another shop. I keep a dozen on hand, so that isn't a problem though.
Muzzy is the BADDEST BLADE MADE....
Visit my hunting homepage.... http://www.geocities.com/hogshooter_2000
Muzzy is the BADDEST BLADE MADE....
Visit my hunting homepage.... http://www.geocities.com/hogshooter_2000
#16
Half a dozen of one....6 of the other!
Both are good heads. I have shot both and both are great. Tune your bow and choose one and you can't go wrong.
SF
Both are good heads. I have shot both and both are great. Tune your bow and choose one and you can't go wrong.
SF
#17
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Lockesburg Ar USA
Get all your buddies together and shoot a little bit of everything represented. That is a cheap way of trying heads out. Two things I won't try to save money on are broadheads and climbing tree stands. (steel force and summit)




