Ok, now look happy for the camera!

I think what it is .. is it has hellaciously long main beams. I've seen 160s deer I'd rather have. This is one ugly rack.

I have seen 140's deer that i would rather have. That deer doesn't have a particularly big rack. I think it's ugly and I would MUCH rather kill a typical 140 8 or 10 pt. JMO

Dude there is no freakin way that deer scores that much (rack-attack"s) sure it has long beams and lots of points but there is no tine length do you have a side ways picture i would sure like to see that because that deer does not even look like a 170 class deer to me and i have seen plenty of em. But in regard to that second deer WOW nicve buck unbelievable MASS thats a bruiser

I didn't shoot it - I only shoot little ones

I agree it does not look it - But it was officially scored and is up at the NYbigbuck websight. I know who mounted it and who scored it (i believe) - I will dig a little deeper if I can.

Dave you are right the main beams are super long...............

There must be a lot we can't see.

Even though his main beams are extra ordinary, from this photo at least, I can't see him qualifying for nearly 200 inches of bone.

I'm wondering if someone on that web page made a recording error.