I was just reading an article in Bowhunting World (april 2004, page 12) Its a story about a guy that killed two bucks with one shot. Now I got to thinkin shouldnt he have not shot at the buck if there was any chance of hitting another deer beond the one he was shooting for? He killed these bucks in Minnesota where it is legal to do this but still shoudnt he have been accurate with his shot? The story goes on to say that the second beuck that was hit and killed was a buck he shot lats year but couldnt find it. I cant believe that this magazine would publish a story like this. I eman it is interesting but it just hsouldnt be done in my opinion.

[Deleted by Admins]

I try not to be judgemental in situations such as this but one thing that I was always taught was not to shoot at a deer if there is another one behind it...gun or bow.

He must of had been a HOYT to get that kind of pass through.

You think that was bad you should have saw the artical I posted a couple months ago about the man just aiming for deer. He just happened to hit it with an arrow on the run.

I am a firm believer in " Know your target and beyond"

Here is the artical word for word. http://forum.hunting.net/asppg/tm.asp?m=502979