So crossbow are legal now......
#481
Guest
Posts: n/a
Nice comparison with cited sources. Click link to download.
http://www.crossbowed.org/images/Cro...%209-15-08.pdf
http://www.crossbowed.org/images/Cro...%209-15-08.pdf
#483
Fork Horn
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saint Robert, MO
Posts: 496
#484
Guest
Posts: n/a
Ok, folks go ahead and open it.
PDF and holes in adobe software is how most trojans are getting thru these days. But sure you know that. Ask adobe.
Trend officescan found it. I seriously doubt you have the security we have. Unless your secure goverment entity. And you could be.
PDF and holes in adobe software is how most trojans are getting thru these days. But sure you know that. Ask adobe.
Trend officescan found it. I seriously doubt you have the security we have. Unless your secure goverment entity. And you could be.
Last edited by bigcountry; 07-20-2010 at 07:12 AM.
#486
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sure you already know this. Explains the adobe flaw. Glad I wasn't at home and tried to open it. I would have never knew.
http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2007/10_24.xml
http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2007/10_24.xml
#487
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,722
MO Archer
Interesting wounding study showing crossbow hunters are no more accurate than compound hunters.
Of course on a range I'm sure they are, but in the woods, in hunting conditions, the negatives of shooting a crossbow comes into play (they're heavy, they're loud, they're cumbersome etc)
ant-crossbow zealots will not recognize this study though ...... of course if it showed crossbows wounded more they would
Interesting wounding study showing crossbow hunters are no more accurate than compound hunters.
Of course on a range I'm sure they are, but in the woods, in hunting conditions, the negatives of shooting a crossbow comes into play (they're heavy, they're loud, they're cumbersome etc)
ant-crossbow zealots will not recognize this study though ...... of course if it showed crossbows wounded more they would
#488
Fork Horn
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saint Robert, MO
Posts: 496
Sure you already know this. Explains the adobe flaw. Glad I wasn't at home and tried to open it. I would have never knew.
http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2007/10_24.xml
http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2007/10_24.xml
#489
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hackers and virus code writers didn't take a break from 2007 til now, I promise you.
You said it was a pdf, but adobe if you call them will explain they have updates after updates to battle this stuff. but you probably know better than them, so I appoligize.
#490
Guest
Posts: n/a
MO Archer
Interesting wounding study showing crossbow hunters are no more accurate than compound hunters.
Of course on a range I'm sure they are, but in the woods, in hunting conditions, the negatives of shooting a crossbow comes into play (they're heavy, they're loud, they're cumbersome etc)
ant-crossbow zealots will not recognize this study though ...... of course if it showed crossbows wounded more they would
Interesting wounding study showing crossbow hunters are no more accurate than compound hunters.
Of course on a range I'm sure they are, but in the woods, in hunting conditions, the negatives of shooting a crossbow comes into play (they're heavy, they're loud, they're cumbersome etc)
ant-crossbow zealots will not recognize this study though ...... of course if it showed crossbows wounded more they would
It was a good study.