hoyts, bowtechs, and matthews suck
12-26-2008, 08:30 PM
#1
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southwest Ohio
Posts: 2,754
hoyts, bowtechs, and matthews suck
A friend of mine has a fred bear recurve bow from the 1980's? It cost him 100 dollars at the time and he has taken over 50 big game animals with it. He can shoot it up to 30 yards without a problem. He thinks that hoyts, bowtechs, and matthews suck becasue they are thousands of dollars and he says that "its the hunter that harvests the animal, not the equpiment" and that those companies are runining hunting. he has a couple vaalid points but how can i talk some sense into this guy? any opinoins?
12-26-2008, 09:25 PM
#6
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 1,559
RE: hoyts, bowtechs, and matthews suck
Your friends words are gospel!!!! The fact is, it is the man behind the bow, not the bow. However, your friend is showing the exact problem in the hunting world. The trad guys against the compound guys, the Bowtech guy against the Matthews guy and so on. The baiters against the non-baiters, the southern guys against the northern guys, the land leasers against the public land guys. We are so divided and cannot get along, just look how much arguing goes on in here.
12-26-2008, 09:38 PM
#7
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central Minnesota
Posts: 9,445
RE: hoyts, bowtechs, and matthews suck
ORIGINAL: mossbergman11/OH
haha yeah he a good hunter with that dam recurve of his. he would be better with a hoyt or something or at least a nice compound
haha yeah he a good hunter with that dam recurve of his. he would be better with a hoyt or something or at least a nice compound
12-26-2008, 10:09 PM
#9
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 7,367
RE: hoyts, bowtechs, and matthews suck
It takes all kinds!
To each there own! No use arguing over something as trivial as choice of equipment, but I can tell you there is power in numbers and our numbers would be no where near what they are if it weren't for compounds!
Dan
To each there own! No use arguing over something as trivial as choice of equipment, but I can tell you there is power in numbers and our numbers would be no where near what they are if it weren't for compounds!
Dan
