"THE" Most Devistating Wound with a Rage Broadhead. Graphic pic.
#71
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
So.....let's raise your hand if you've used the Rage head (2-blade) and you've actually broken one.
So.....let's raise your hand if you've used the Rage head (2-blade) and you've actually broken one.
Ah, I thought we had a smiley with his hand raised.....we don't....anyway, I've broken one, and a buddy of mine has broken one. Busted the blades off. Just normal shots, busted ribs coming out. Presumably where the blades broke. Is it possible they hit something in the ground after the pass through? Yeah. I will also say the 3 blade is less durable than the 2, in my experience anyway.
I'm using Hypershocks this year, and other than the smaller entry hole I'm expecting this head to be every bit as deadly as the Rage. I agree that the big entry hole is certainly a plus the Rage has over the Hypershock....But I have a suspicion the damage will be AT LEAST equal to it. We'll see I hope. And I'll have pics as well.
#72
ORIGINAL: DannyD
Hey Schultzy,
If the shaft didn't go through the deer and only the blade hit the neck wouldn't the rage have missed the deer?.
Hey Schultzy,
If the shaft didn't go through the deer and only the blade hit the neck wouldn't the rage have missed the deer?.
ORIGINAL: bowman15
Shultzy, if the center of theZwickey didn't hit the animal, the center of a Rage wouldn't have neither, andit wouldn't have opened. Then the same thing would have happened, with even less damage, correct?
If one 'shoulder' of the blade hits the animal, that blade opens on the opposite side of the head.
Shultzy, if the center of theZwickey didn't hit the animal, the center of a Rage wouldn't have neither, andit wouldn't have opened. Then the same thing would have happened, with even less damage, correct?
If one 'shoulder' of the blade hits the animal, that blade opens on the opposite side of the head.
#74
Fork Horn
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: IOWA
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
I might be the only person I know of who's actually broken a Rage head. I spined a 200# buck last year and lodged it halfway into his spinal column. Still......dead deer. Other than that.....I don't know of anyone who's broken one.
MANY, many guys are using these heads and have used them in the "last three years" (about how long they've been out). I've been saying for a while, now.......I'd love to see some of the damage the "30 years" tested guys heads have been inflicting, for comparison. Not too many takers from the peanut gallery of haters. Not surprising.
So.....let's raise your hand if you've used the Rage head (2-blade) and you've actually broken one. I keep hearing of their frail makeup......but have found it "nearly" impossible to get one to break. Again.....if you've been killing deer (not just hunting) for 30 years and have photos of the destruction your head is inflicting......start yourself a thread and post 'em up! I'd love to see them!
Absolutely,
And on heavy bone such as shoulder etc. I have seen too many mechanicals fail. By fail, I mean either physically break or just plain fail to penetrate because it was too large of cutting surface.I will stick with what I have seen outperform the large mechanicals over time. I have used both on many deer and will always go with first-hand experience of 30 years of bowhunting. Good luck.
And on heavy bone such as shoulder etc. I have seen too many mechanicals fail. By fail, I mean either physically break or just plain fail to penetrate because it was too large of cutting surface.I will stick with what I have seen outperform the large mechanicals over time. I have used both on many deer and will always go with first-hand experience of 30 years of bowhunting. Good luck.
MANY, many guys are using these heads and have used them in the "last three years" (about how long they've been out). I've been saying for a while, now.......I'd love to see some of the damage the "30 years" tested guys heads have been inflicting, for comparison. Not too many takers from the peanut gallery of haters. Not surprising.
So.....let's raise your hand if you've used the Rage head (2-blade) and you've actually broken one. I keep hearing of their frail makeup......but have found it "nearly" impossible to get one to break. Again.....if you've been killing deer (not just hunting) for 30 years and have photos of the destruction your head is inflicting......start yourself a thread and post 'em up! I'd love to see them!
PGH
(peanut gallery hater)

#76
ORIGINAL: buckmaster
Have you guys ever made a less than perfect shot ona deer? Do you think the outcome wouldve been different if you had that extra cut in there? Our goal as hunters is to kill the deer as Quickly as possible, with minimal suffering to the animal. In order to acheive that... It's not always going to be pretty. If you dont think the MOST devistation is needed to harvest the animal more quickly, than maybe you should carry a camera. JMO
I honestly think if I would have shot this deer with a muzzy or other small bh, I may have still been out there looking right now. In the rain.
ORIGINAL: fletch920
I would have to agree.
ORIGINAL: Tribal
I am obviously in the minority here, lol I just don't think that's necassary. I never had a problem with a deer dropping usually in sight with a well placed shot from a normal broadhead. That's just a mess to clean up and or for dirt and debris to gather in. Overkill IMO
I am obviously in the minority here, lol I just don't think that's necassary. I never had a problem with a deer dropping usually in sight with a well placed shot from a normal broadhead. That's just a mess to clean up and or for dirt and debris to gather in. Overkill IMO
I honestly think if I would have shot this deer with a muzzy or other small bh, I may have still been out there looking right now. In the rain.
My last less than perfect hit was 3 years ago and I have shot probably 15-20 whitetail since then. I don't believe I need to have the ability to gut the thing with one shotwith my broadhead. The object for me is not tomutilate the animal. I want the meat and I want clean kills, yesbad shots happen it's a part of hunting, but if you have bad enough shots often enough to feel you need to have a broadhead that does that maybe you should keep practicing and pick your shots. Thats what I do and never had many problems. It is impressive coming from a arrow no doubt. Just for me personally I don't want that.What a mess.
#77
You can look at this 2 ways; if Buckmaster wasn't using the Rage, he wouldn't have killed this doe. He'll tell you that himself. None of the vital-organs were hit here. This would have been another low-hit, injured deer if the cutting-diameter was smaller, or the blades in a different position at the hit. It was a bad shot that turned out well because the blades were in the right position to open her hide up like this.
But on the other hand, this was a purely lucky kill, regardless of the head.Look at that picture real close; if the hit was an inch lower, or an inch or 2 further forward or back, it would have been a much different outcome. He hit her on the right-side, with her right leg forward and her left leg back, mid-stride. If the hit was just an inch farther back, it would have hit that big bone right there. How would it have turned out then? And if he were using another head, he would have hit that artery just the same, which was pure luck. (Sorry , but I can't seem to draw on it to show everything I'm talking about)
I really think some of you guys are getting carried away with this "awesome" broadhead. I mean, there's no doubt it cuts a big hole, but so what? There's ALOT of deer taken that go nowhere nearly as far as this doe did, with smaller holes. This one was just a lucky shot and outcome, no offense to Buckmaster.
But on the other hand, this was a purely lucky kill, regardless of the head.Look at that picture real close; if the hit was an inch lower, or an inch or 2 further forward or back, it would have been a much different outcome. He hit her on the right-side, with her right leg forward and her left leg back, mid-stride. If the hit was just an inch farther back, it would have hit that big bone right there. How would it have turned out then? And if he were using another head, he would have hit that artery just the same, which was pure luck. (Sorry , but I can't seem to draw on it to show everything I'm talking about)
I really think some of you guys are getting carried away with this "awesome" broadhead. I mean, there's no doubt it cuts a big hole, but so what? There's ALOT of deer taken that go nowhere nearly as far as this doe did, with smaller holes. This one was just a lucky shot and outcome, no offense to Buckmaster.
#79
I actually ordered some of those Aftershock Archery "boosters" that add 25gr to the front of your arrow (I get a weak spine reaction with 100gr heads.... so I have to shoot 125).
Hunting where I do... I need a deer to die like now.... because 150 yards will be in somebodies front yard.... so 100gr 2 blade..... + booster = 125gr head.
Welcome to the dark side.... hope they have cookies....
Hunting where I do... I need a deer to die like now.... because 150 yards will be in somebodies front yard.... so 100gr 2 blade..... + booster = 125gr head.
Welcome to the dark side.... hope they have cookies....
#80
I have put one in my quiver this year to try it out... I know I had a cousin shoot a deer with one and I was impressed when we could stick a fist in the entry hole.. But geeeez, you could dang neer climb inside that entry hole you got.. lol
Probably not the strongest broadhead but I would have to say the most devistating.
Probably not the strongest broadhead but I would have to say the most devistating.



thats incredible!! holy crap!!