You can look at this 2 ways; if Buckmaster wasn't using the Rage, he wouldn't have killed this doe. He'll tell you that himself. None of the vital-organs were hit here. This would have been another low-hit, injured deer if the cutting-diameter was smaller, or the blades in a different position at the hit. It was a bad shot that turned out well because the blades were in the right position to open her hide up like this.

But on the other hand, this was a purely lucky kill, regardless of the head.Look at that picture real close; if the hit was an inch lower, or an inch or 2 further forward or back, it would have been a much different outcome. He hit her on the right-side, with her right leg forward and her left leg back, mid-stride. If the hit was just an inch farther back, it would have hit that big bone right there. How would it have turned out then? And if he were using another head, he would have hit that artery just the same, which was pure luck. (Sorry , but I can't seem to draw on it to show everything I'm talking about)

I really think some of you guys are getting carried away with this "awesome" broadhead. I mean, there's no doubt it cuts a big hole, but so what? There's ALOT of deer taken that go nowhere nearly as far as this doe did, with smaller holes. This one was just a lucky shot and outcome, no offense to Buckmaster.