May be we should
#1
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 0
From: Memphis TN USA
Maybe we should use the bowhunting contest to compile some statistical data to help settle the scent lok argument. Just to keep it simple we could have categories like no scent control, full scent lok with full scent control measures, full scent control measures without scentlok and then determine the % of hunters in each group that kill a buck and the average gross score of the deer killed by the hunters in each group. Just an idea.......
#4
Maybe we should use the bowhunting contest to compile some statistical data to help settle the scent lok argument. Just to keep it simple we could have categories like no scent control, full scent lok with full scent control measures, full scent control measures without scentlok and then determine the % of hunters in each group that kill a buck and the average gross score of the deer killed by the hunters in each group. Just an idea.......
Gee that sounds great. Wonderful in fact. That should solve it once and for all.
Heck.. while we're at it.. let's throw in our bow manufacturer's as well.
I've always wanted to see who sold the bow that gets the most amount of deer taken. Then I can buy that bow next year!
Awesome!
#7
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: Southwest PA
Great Idea. Maybe we could include other stats like:
What Bow did you use?
Did you pay attention to wind?
What type of tree stand/blind did you use? (ladder, climbing, etc)
Time of kill (morning, mid day, evening)
Type of calls used (grunts, bleats, rattling, etc.)
Did you use any scents or lures?
What state were you in?
I'm sure there are others that would be interesting to see as well.
What Bow did you use?
Did you pay attention to wind?
What type of tree stand/blind did you use? (ladder, climbing, etc)
Time of kill (morning, mid day, evening)
Type of calls used (grunts, bleats, rattling, etc.)
Did you use any scents or lures?
What state were you in?
I'm sure there are others that would be interesting to see as well.
#8
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,434
Likes: 0
From:
ORIGINAL: Pops423
Great Idea. Maybe we could include other stats like:
What Bow did you use?
Did you pay attention to wind?
What type of tree stand/blind did you use? (ladder, climbing, etc)
Time of kill (morning, mid day, evening)
Type of calls used (grunts, bleats, rattling, etc.)
Did you use any scents or lures?
What state were you in?
I'm sure there are others that would be interesting to see as well.
Great Idea. Maybe we could include other stats like:
What Bow did you use?
Did you pay attention to wind?
What type of tree stand/blind did you use? (ladder, climbing, etc)
Time of kill (morning, mid day, evening)
Type of calls used (grunts, bleats, rattling, etc.)
Did you use any scents or lures?
What state were you in?
I'm sure there are others that would be interesting to see as well.
What type of bow string
What sight
Whisker Biscuit or Drop away
Time the stand was set up
Temperature
Arrows used
Broadhead used
What food was eaten on stand
What type of cell phone you have in your bag
What safty harness
Religion
Hours of scouting done
What type of camo
Nearest road nearby
High fence or not
Boot Size
Glove Size
Release
Peep used or no
What type of string supresser or limg thing
Stabalizer or not
Just a few variables I thought of
#9
Fork Horn
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From:
What is there to settle ..... It don't work . It takes a much higher temp to reactivate carbon then what a normal dryer can reach . And then you do hit that temp your garmet will burst into flames
#10
It's a known fact, Bowtech 360,that more big bucks are killed every fallby Baptists than any other religious group.
They're prolific hunters.....but wouldn't be caught dead making love while standing up. Someone may mistaken it for dancing.
They're prolific hunters.....but wouldn't be caught dead making love while standing up. Someone may mistaken it for dancing.


