HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Bowhunting (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting-18/)
-   -   Hunt By Numbers. (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting/252032-hunt-numbers.html)

LouisianaTomkat 07-08-2008 06:49 PM

RE: Hunt By Numbers.
 
I work for a Cellular phone service carrier. In Cellsite Tech terms we have what is called an MSA and an RSA. An MSA is a "Metropolitan Service Area". An RSA is a "Rural Service Area". It all boils down to this. Some of us hunt in MSA's and some hunt in RSA's.

Same old BS, different day.

LT

JoeRE 07-08-2008 06:58 PM

RE: Hunt By Numbers.
 

ORIGINAL: GMMAT

...and actually thought it waould be a neat discussion.




If I had a penny every time I heard that:eek:....

GMMAT 07-08-2008 07:04 PM

RE: Hunt By Numbers.
 
Joe...

Just because you can't understand and follow along......that doesn't mean it can't be interesting for the rest of us.

Math is fun. Don't be a hater!:)

MN/Kyle 07-08-2008 07:07 PM

RE: Hunt By Numbers.
 
.

gri22ly 07-08-2008 09:30 PM

RE: Hunt By Numbers.
 
I've seen something like this before, but the odds were based on B&C bucks instead of age, someone else can find out how many 5 1/2 year olds it takes to get a B&C buck. The odds weremuch better than I thought. They took the number oflicensed hunters over a 10 year period and divided by the the number of170" typical and 195" nontypicals foreach state over the same 10 year period. I can'tremember the exact numbers, but this is close.

Kansas was #1 at1in 4000 something odds each year
Illinois was #2 at 1 in 12,000 something odds each year
Kentucky was #3 at 1 in 18,000 something odds each year
And the numbers keep going up from there. Also figure in that allot of those hunters sight there gun in the day before season and hunt one weekend a year. Also figure in that 80% shoot the firstbuck they see.

Dubbya 07-08-2008 10:25 PM

RE: Hunt By Numbers.
 
I think those coaster size nipples are getting out of control. However, I see a I like your logic... numbers don't lie. You're still the undisputed king of small deer in my book. Keep it up buddy, keep it up.

davidmil 07-08-2008 11:13 PM

RE: Hunt By Numbers.
 
God, I never thought I'd say this, but I long for the old days when threads were declared off topic and the author was given a stern warning. OH wait, that still happens for some. Ok, forget what I said.

TEmbry 07-08-2008 11:24 PM

RE: Hunt By Numbers.
 

ORIGINAL: TEmbry

So what the king is trying to tell me, is that there are 7 to 8 3.5yo bucks on a 10,000 acre public hunting grounds, by his numbers. Hasn't his majesty himself hunted bigger tracts than this?

I thought these bucks don't exist in PA?:D;)
Incase his Majesty missed it the first time around.[8D]

wis_bow_huntr 07-09-2008 05:27 AM

RE: Hunt By Numbers.
 
ummmm im telling...............MOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY! :D

Germ 07-09-2008 05:28 AM

RE: Hunt By Numbers.
 

ORIGINAL: Dubbya

I think those coaster size nipples are getting out of control. However, I see a I like your logic... numbers don't lie. You're still the undisputed king of small deer in my book. Keep it up buddy, keep it up.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.