Big Buck Barometer
#91
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
I laugh out loud at statements like this.....as if I don't "want it enough" (which I most certainly don't care about).(and I'm not making fun of you, Gary...at all)
I suppose....using this "logic"....we could say that anyone not willing to pack up ship and re-locate to the Alberta bow zone.....isn't "willing to pay the price".
I mean IFthey wanted to...[8D] It's REALLY (as hard as this might be to believe)....not that important to me. I want to kill the best represntative deer every year (or so) from my woods. Nothing more.
He asked what that was.....and I told him.
So IF you Jeff wanted to try and shoot bigger buck in your state what would you do? What would it cost you? Are you willing to pay the price?
I suppose....using this "logic"....we could say that anyone not willing to pack up ship and re-locate to the Alberta bow zone.....isn't "willing to pay the price".
I mean IFthey wanted to...[8D] It's REALLY (as hard as this might be to believe)....not that important to me. I want to kill the best represntative deer every year (or so) from my woods. Nothing more.
He asked what that was.....and I told him.

We were only talking in our hunting areas, your state, I never stated anything about "enough". We all have choices. I make choice that I think is the best for me, we know you do the same.
The question still is the same. If you, me, John want to shoot bigger buck in our location. What we would have to do.
For me it's simple more time, and I do not have it.
#92
ORIGINAL: Vabowman
A buck from 100-125" is very common here in south east Va. On the places I hunt and the surrounding areas several in 135-165" class are killed every year. Anything above the 165" class is not as common. I would say there maybe 2 or 3 170+ killed in this area which is 25 mile radius a yr.
A buck from 100-125" is very common here in south east Va. On the places I hunt and the surrounding areas several in 135-165" class are killed every year. Anything above the 165" class is not as common. I would say there maybe 2 or 3 170+ killed in this area which is 25 mile radius a yr.
I'd say thats about a perfect assessment sir. Any buck that is 125" and up will get noticed and get you slaps on the back. They are there, and while I may have never found any sheds, I don't put a lot of effort forth to find them either... maybe one or two walk-abouts.
On 500 acres last year, I got pictures of four bucks that would make Pope and Young, and another one that is flirting but I don't think quite at 170" gross....I am confident he would gross over 160" for the awards in B&C... but would fall short net because of deductions (see pictures below).... he is a trophy animal either way. I also found those two bucks that killed each other locked up right behind the club house in the pond... the final scores of those two, by the way, were 129 4/8 and 126 6/8 net. Both grossed over 130".
I put a thread up about them... there are the pictures in the first post of the thread:
http://www.hunting.net/forum/tm.aspx...&key=�
There are a few bigguns running around too.... this was one of the best... gross over 160" I'd say... net... ehhh who knows.... hard to tell... definately pretty though:
#93
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
I suppose....using this "logic"....we could say that anyone not willing to pack up ship and re-locate to the Alberta bow zone.....isn't "willing to pay the price".
So IF you Jeff wanted to try and shoot bigger buck in your state what would you do? What would it cost you? Are you willing to pay the price?

#94
Here Jeff I will start
Phone rang
Gary do you want in on my lease, the prices is x.
Let me talk it over with my wife and think about it.
Issues
1. Money -no problem Ihave the cash for the lease.
2.Are there deer there I want to shoot. See his book that is where he shot them all
3. Travel is 65 miles from my house
4. Time I am going to be away for weekends and not home.
5. Ease to hunt
Issue three was a big one for me, I would drive by Gas bill up a LOT. But more than bill was the time of getting there to my stand. Currently I can leave my house and be hunting in my tree in less than 30 mins. The new place would be just under two hours. Also the time coming home I would not be able to put the kids to bed.
Being away for more weekends was not going to work for Mrs. Germ or me.
Ease to hunt was even bigger. I would be using my climber, no easy climbs in hang on, no nice boat ride.
Even though I really wanted to hunt the place, it was not worth it to me from what I already hunt.
Has nothing to do with how much I want to shoot big bucks or how much I want it. It has to do with what is important to me. Is giving up what I listed above worth antler on the wall? I think not, and this is a choice we all make. My point is and always will be, we all have a choice
Phone rang
Gary do you want in on my lease, the prices is x.
Let me talk it over with my wife and think about it.
Issues
1. Money -no problem Ihave the cash for the lease.
2.Are there deer there I want to shoot. See his book that is where he shot them all
3. Travel is 65 miles from my house
4. Time I am going to be away for weekends and not home.
5. Ease to hunt
Issue three was a big one for me, I would drive by Gas bill up a LOT. But more than bill was the time of getting there to my stand. Currently I can leave my house and be hunting in my tree in less than 30 mins. The new place would be just under two hours. Also the time coming home I would not be able to put the kids to bed.
Being away for more weekends was not going to work for Mrs. Germ or me.
Ease to hunt was even bigger. I would be using my climber, no easy climbs in hang on, no nice boat ride.
Even though I really wanted to hunt the place, it was not worth it to me from what I already hunt.
Has nothing to do with how much I want to shoot big bucks or how much I want it. It has to do with what is important to me. Is giving up what I listed above worth antler on the wall? I think not, and this is a choice we all make. My point is and always will be, we all have a choice

#96
Dominant Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,199
Likes: 1
From: Blossvale, New York
ORIGINAL: Matt / PA
Statistical Anomaly 9/07
R.I.P.

But if anyone thinks that the fact that me and my statistical anomaly were in the same place at the same time was also an anomaly you'd be mistaken.
What I find intersting is that I seem to get a "vibe" from here that because some of us in underprivilaged areas don't kill big bucks like that regularly we're somehow not looking hard enough?
LOL I find it almost comical sometimes to read some of it...........
You guys ever see the video "bowhunting Pressured Whitetails"? .....I just picked up a copy of this much heralded video a little while back (the pre-season scouting volume) And almost laughed out loud when I watched it. You could have taken a Sony Handicam along with me from the preseason through the first week of the season last year and simply changed the name on the cover of the video. Stuff I learned through 23 years of trial and error turns out to be the "right way" to a T and I have one statistical anomaly to show for 23 years of hunting PA>
Now fast forward to the midwest......I hunted there for the first time in 2003 (Nebraska) and saw an honest 5 bucks that would go over P&Y and 2 that would push Boone and Crockett in 6 days of hunting. I also passed 4 bucks at under 10 yards that would have been 20-40" bigger than any deer I had previously killed in PA. IN 6 DAYS.
2004 ....more of the same and first time ever in Illinois, I blew a chip shot opportunity at a 160" 10pt the very first morning of DAY ONE after never seeing the leased property before in my life other than some fuzzy airials to start a scouting search. Hung a stand the night before and bingo, (If I didn't spook the doe he was with trying to get into position for a shot
)
Passed another buck that would have been 40" bigger than any I had killed in my life in PA (because of the first encounter) and saw 4 other bucks that would make P&Y without hesitation. In 7 Days of hunting.
2006,2007.......back to IL. Now hunting with Greg on some established ground he hunts. This is in the right state and we hunt some tough public land bucks. I missed a P&Y buck in the first 3 days of the 2006 season, and saw one other that would make P&Y for sure. 2007 I almost shot a solid 135" buck in the first evening of day one, passed many deer that would have been toast in PA.
So what is the common denominator herethat allowed me to see roughly 14 P&Y bucks (some going close to that magical 170" mark) in a matter of roughly 4 weeks of stand time when I hadn't seen but a single one in 23 YEARS prior in PA?
And my god these weren't even outfitter hunts! These were just a lease, and hunting with some friends on knock on door type properties in unmanaged areas.
You can get blood from a stone but by God you have to squeeze the ever loving crap out of it and it might take 23 years to see a drop.
It's easy to sit back and say "you're not trying hard enough" or "you're not looking in the right places," but there comes a point where you are legitimately and routinely shooting the biggest deer around, and you have to accept that you're not hunting in Pike County.Or just realize that you're waiting for a statistical anomaly that might only come along once-in-a-lifetime. If ever.
R.I.P.

But if anyone thinks that the fact that me and my statistical anomaly were in the same place at the same time was also an anomaly you'd be mistaken.
What I find intersting is that I seem to get a "vibe" from here that because some of us in underprivilaged areas don't kill big bucks like that regularly we're somehow not looking hard enough?
LOL I find it almost comical sometimes to read some of it...........
You guys ever see the video "bowhunting Pressured Whitetails"? .....I just picked up a copy of this much heralded video a little while back (the pre-season scouting volume) And almost laughed out loud when I watched it. You could have taken a Sony Handicam along with me from the preseason through the first week of the season last year and simply changed the name on the cover of the video. Stuff I learned through 23 years of trial and error turns out to be the "right way" to a T and I have one statistical anomaly to show for 23 years of hunting PA>
Now fast forward to the midwest......I hunted there for the first time in 2003 (Nebraska) and saw an honest 5 bucks that would go over P&Y and 2 that would push Boone and Crockett in 6 days of hunting. I also passed 4 bucks at under 10 yards that would have been 20-40" bigger than any deer I had previously killed in PA. IN 6 DAYS.
2004 ....more of the same and first time ever in Illinois, I blew a chip shot opportunity at a 160" 10pt the very first morning of DAY ONE after never seeing the leased property before in my life other than some fuzzy airials to start a scouting search. Hung a stand the night before and bingo, (If I didn't spook the doe he was with trying to get into position for a shot
)Passed another buck that would have been 40" bigger than any I had killed in my life in PA (because of the first encounter) and saw 4 other bucks that would make P&Y without hesitation. In 7 Days of hunting.
2006,2007.......back to IL. Now hunting with Greg on some established ground he hunts. This is in the right state and we hunt some tough public land bucks. I missed a P&Y buck in the first 3 days of the 2006 season, and saw one other that would make P&Y for sure. 2007 I almost shot a solid 135" buck in the first evening of day one, passed many deer that would have been toast in PA.
So what is the common denominator herethat allowed me to see roughly 14 P&Y bucks (some going close to that magical 170" mark) in a matter of roughly 4 weeks of stand time when I hadn't seen but a single one in 23 YEARS prior in PA?
And my god these weren't even outfitter hunts! These were just a lease, and hunting with some friends on knock on door type properties in unmanaged areas.

You can get blood from a stone but by God you have to squeeze the ever loving crap out of it and it might take 23 years to see a drop.
#97
ORIGINAL: BigJ71
Greg,
Fair enough, but my question really pertains to adult years of hunting. You'll notice that when speaking of my hunting career I use the last 20+ years as an example. Truth be told I started deer hunting with my dad when I was a 9 but I don't claim to have 34 years of deer hunting experience nor do I count those early years when it pertains to the scenario questioned in this thread.
So...that being said, I have a few more questions.
How many years in the last 14 (since 1994) of hunting Illinois have you gotten skunked or not seen a P&Y caliber deer?.
Greg,
Fair enough, but my question really pertains to adult years of hunting. You'll notice that when speaking of my hunting career I use the last 20+ years as an example. Truth be told I started deer hunting with my dad when I was a 9 but I don't claim to have 34 years of deer hunting experience nor do I count those early years when it pertains to the scenario questioned in this thread.
So...that being said, I have a few more questions.
How many years in the last 14 (since 1994) of hunting Illinois have you gotten skunked or not seen a P&Y caliber deer?.
It's nice that you have your own way of breaking down your hunting experience according to pre-teen, teen, adult, middle-age and senior years. I did not know that you were only talking about "adult" years of hunting. I too roamed the woods with my dad when I was 9. However, I count the years that I had my very own bowhunting liscense as years of bowhunting experience. So that would be 41 years of experience not 43.
In the last 14 years of hunting Ill I did not shot a mature buck during 6 of the 14 seasons. Of those 6, there were some that I did see a P&Y caliber deer, I don't remember how many.
That "trophy-heavy" area couldn't have been Illinois because that would mean you didn't kill a mature deer in Illinois until 2002 because you started hunting Illinois in 1994. So we're to assume that the choice to hunt Illinois had NOTHING to do with the obvious spike introphy caliber deer you've seem to be seeing/killing?
You really shouldn't assume anything about my hunting, John, because you don't know. Well I'll tell you.... after the first P&Y in '91, I shot4 more P&Y class bucks in a row. Then my land was sold in '96. I had to find a new spot in Wi. In the mean time I had hunted Ill for the last 2 seasons. I bagged my first big one in Ill in '96 and mythird one in '01. Skunked in both states in '97 but doubled in '98, '03 and '04. 2004 was the last time I was able to hunt in my home county but have been hunting up north (where I want to move). So for the 3 seasons I have bow hunted Ill until successful and then went up north to hunt. So far I only got a 130" up there with my rifle. So my total is 8 with a bow in Wi and 8 with a bow in Ill and one with a rifle in wi. 17 total.
As you can see, my success is about equal in either state and have averaged taking a mature buck for each of the 17 seasons that I've been hunting them.
I'm still finding it hard to believe you didn't see a P&Y caliberdeer in a trophy-heavy area for eight years when I've been seeing them for 20+ in not so "trophy-heavy" areas ofIllinois.
Experience while necessary is NOT the only prerequisite needed to killing P&Y caliber deer, you need to be where they are to do so as well. I'd venture to say that there are a lot of hunters in PA and VA and NC, etc...that are far more skilled and put more time and effort into pursuing Whitetail deerthan you or I, yet they don't have the antler inches that you or I do hanging on their walls.
I'm not about to say who is more skilled than myself anywhere, especially in other states. There are too many variables as to why I might have more inches of antler hanging on my walls. I would guess that the number one reason would be that I put in more time than most. Because if they were as skilled or more skilledthan I am, they'd certainly be hunting in a location where they had a reasonable chance of success.
For us to think otherwise is arrogant at the least and borderline self absorbed elitism because the bottom line is their states don't hold the number of P&Y deer as ours do thus their opportunities for killing a P&Y deer drop off drastically. EVEN if all the "best, most skilled trophy hunters" traveled and gathered in the few isolated areas where P&Y bucks were killed, they STILL wouldn't kill the numbers the average Joe kills in the big buck states so it isn't all about skill. It all boils down to location....like it or not.
It really does not ALL boil down to location. Location is only part of the equation, like it or not...... that's gospel. [:-]
#98
I would say realisticly speaking 140-160 would be considered top end bucks in my area. Every year someone gets a 125-135. Looking at the books for my county there are several 150's a ton of 130's an 140's an occasionally 160-170's. For the mostpart I can see taking an 130's to 140's any year. Any bigger than that is hopes. An I hope this will come by me this year an he is bigger than this.
#100
Is that what you think?? If your answer is no then what do YOU attribute to low numbers of P&Y bucks killed in those states to??
I have studied this a lot, and here it is.
We shoot them all before they have a chance to get big
70+% here in MI, but I think it's way higher. In state where the numbers of older deer is high it's because of deer management and low hunting numbers.Here is a great stat, Jeff has shot 2 bigger deer than all my family members but 1 in MI. My GrandFather has never shot a deer over 100'' in Northen MI[&:]
Matt here another anomoly in MI. John hunts state and private land in Mid Michigan. The odds in MI are 1-5000, in Mid MI they are a bit worst. The is a reason WKPTodd moved to Iowa. If you have not read John books they are great.
John's site
http://www.eberhartsbowhunting.com/
Check out his early years



