![]() |
RE: My "bow only" poll
If they'd all had their voices be heard and penned in the US Constitution, Christine....we'd all be better for it....and there would be no such debates.;) |
RE: My "bow only" poll
For ****s and giggles.....it would have been nice to ask a black MAN (prior to 1869) and ANY woman (prior to 1920) what they thought of our forefather's "foresight". |
RE: My "bow only" poll
Original: Quicksilver The Petitioners proffered a very strong argument, alleging that the definition of "keep and bear" is relegated strictly to militia service. Secondly, during the ratification process, there was significant tension among the colonies to retain the right to raise a State-Army as a check-and-balance on the Federal Government. A federal army posed a direct threat to state sovereignty. There is voluminous support for this, and it is largely undisputed. That is why I am asking for clarification from their perspective then as to why the additional phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" was added if the framers were so careful and deliberate in their wording. It would seem to be unecessay and ambiguous if Steven's argument was valid, but maybe I am missing something, at least from "their" perspective. |
RE: My "bow only" poll
Light up a cigarette in public, and you get thirty days in jail and fined 500 bucks. Socialism. How about "Democracy".....or "Representative Republic"? Jeff - I understand that, but unless I am misunderstanding Fran, the Stevens argument is that the only"right" granted to individuals was to serve in a state militia if it became necessary. That is why I am asking for clarification from their perspective then as to why the additional phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" was added if the framers were so careful and deliberate in their wording. It would seem to be unecessay and ambiguous if Steven's argument was valid, but maybe I am missing something, at least from "their" perspective. For the "average Joe" gun owner......he basically thinks that the 2nd amendment says that the US Goverment has no right to take away his guns. In reality.....as simplistic as that sounds to the strict constructionist......it IS as simple as that. The USSC said so, last week. |
RE: My "bow only" poll
Lets keep this debate grounded people.....we are not anywhere remotely close to debating any socialist tendancies, hypothetical or otherwise....
Socialism: 1.a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole. 2.procedure or practice in accordance with this theory. 3.(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles. |
RE: My "bow only" poll
If you want gun freedom, be prepared to build lots of prisons and pay the piper when the tax bill comes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyoLuTjguJA |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:22 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.