For the love of...
#1
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 957

I've been having an amusing debate with a fellow bow hunter over on a local SC talk fourm over the "innovations" that Mathews and Hoyt have brought to archery. He can not seem to get it through his thick Hoyt shooting head that most of the "innovations" produced by Mathews were used years before Mathews had anything to do with it. Its like another guy on the forum said..."mathews marketing made other bow companies' innovations popular".
I am so tired of hearing all the Mathews shooters talk about Mathews' "innovations". Hear some say it they invented the compound bow. It would be different if it were true, but its not. Martin and other companies came out with most of the things that Mathews got the credit for.
For the love of God!!!!! Please do your homework!!!!
I am so tired of hearing all the Mathews shooters talk about Mathews' "innovations". Hear some say it they invented the compound bow. It would be different if it were true, but its not. Martin and other companies came out with most of the things that Mathews got the credit for.
For the love of God!!!!! Please do your homework!!!!
#3
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 957

On top? OMG here it goes again. Show me numbers that prove that "they" hold more market share than anyone. Please show me the market share numbers. I asked the other guy to show me the numbers also. All he could say is "i have big name friends in the industry and thats what they say".
#4
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jefferson County, Missouri
Posts: 7,684

who freaking cares, getting over fights about who makes the "best" bows, and "best" broadheads is stupid anyway. i cant believe some people treat bow companie rivalries like they do the yankees-red sox rivalry.
pretty immature to argue about things like this imo
sorry just had to vent
pretty immature to argue about things like this imo
sorry just had to vent
#6

ORIGINAL: StrutNtom
On top? OMG here it goes again. Show me numbers that prove that "they" hold more market share than anyone. Please show me the market share numbers. I asked the other guy to show me the numbers also. All he could say is "i have big name friends in the industry and thats what they say".
On top? OMG here it goes again. Show me numbers that prove that "they" hold more market share than anyone. Please show me the market share numbers. I asked the other guy to show me the numbers also. All he could say is "i have big name friends in the industry and thats what they say".
#8
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 957

So just another fan boy blowing hot hair. No numbers to prove that they are "on top".
Roy, its not that I care for arguments sake. I just like the facts to be known. Not distored.
Roy, its not that I care for arguments sake. I just like the facts to be known. Not distored.
#9

ORIGINAL: StrutNtom
So just another fan boy blowing hot hair. No numbers to prove that they are "on top".
Roy, its not that I care for arguments sake. I just like the facts to be known. Not distored.
So just another fan boy blowing hot hair. No numbers to prove that they are "on top".
Roy, its not that I care for arguments sake. I just like the facts to be known. Not distored.
#10
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jefferson County, Missouri
Posts: 7,684

ORIGINAL: StrutNtom
So just another fan boy blowing hot hair. No numbers to prove that they are "on top".
Roy, its not that I care for arguments sake. I just like the facts to be known. Not distored.
So just another fan boy blowing hot hair. No numbers to prove that they are "on top".
Roy, its not that I care for arguments sake. I just like the facts to be known. Not distored.
gaaahhhhhhh you can not even imagine how old this gets