![]() |
RE: Broadhead ?
ORIGINAL: LouisianaTomkat For all practical purposes though, wouldn't they give better penetration? |
RE: Broadhead ?
If it's better, why not shoot it? |
RE: Broadhead ?
Original: rybohunter If you consider 6" into the dirt better than 5.5" then yes, probably. |
RE: Broadhead ?
ORIGINAL: LouisianaTomkat Original: rybohunter If you consider 6" into the dirt better than 5.5" then yes, probably. |
RE: Broadhead ?
Ability to cut, rather than poke a hole in the animal. Does that make sense Huntingbry?
|
RE: Broadhead ?
LT....the huge wounds I've been showing you in my photos ARE the entrance wounds.:D
|
RE: Broadhead ?
Jeff, simmons has a 2" COC called the tree shark!!! Weighs in at a nice light 190 gr. and knowing simmons it probably wieghs more than that!! Usually 5-10gr. heavier than stated.
|
RE: Broadhead ?
ORIGINAL: LouisianaTomkat Ability to cut, rather than poke a hole in the animal. Does that make sense Huntingbry? |
RE: Broadhead ?
Granted this is not an actual animal I did this withbut shooting different COC heads side by side withthe short heads like the slick trick the ST style heads consistantly out penetrate COC heads by a couple of inchesin arcehry targets.
|
RE: Broadhead ?
Because they don't (to my knowledge) make one as big as the one I shoot......with the same flight characteristics I demand. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.