all or nothing?
03-21-2008 | 02:18 PM
#11
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
RE: all or nothing?
very good point.. wish i could do that ... where i hunt i feel like if i dont shoot it the deer will jus walk 200 yards an get shot!
03-21-2008 | 02:19 PM
#12
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 0
From: Northern Idaho's Panhandle
RE: all or nothing?
long as I have elk to fill the freezer, I get to be picky on whitetail bucks.. I like it that way.. but would try to kill a big one every year...4-5 years is a long time to go without gutting a big buck..
03-21-2008 | 02:32 PM
#13
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
From:
RE: all or nothing?
ORIGINAL: Born 2 Bow Hunt
Sorry, I just could never understand that logic....Let the other guys shoot the small ones and leave the woods so the giants can come out. If one keeps the logic to shoot the first buck which comes by...the chance of seeing a monster is demised. I saw twenty four bucks last year before shooting a 140.....
very good point.. wish i could do that ... where i hunt i feel like if i dont shoot it the deer will jus walk 200 yards an get shot!
03-21-2008 | 03:31 PM
#16
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
RE: all or nothing?
my only prob with that is a "140" doesnt exist round here...if i was hunting somewhere where they are not so far an few bewteen id would let everyhting walk without a problem. i guess i could wait out for my "100" inch an consider that my monster
That is what I thought until about 20 years ago when I stopped shooting the smaller bucks......
nodog:
I don't know about WR but you are in a good state to get a monster
