![]() |
Tuning with just one method
If you could only tune your setup using just one method which would you use.
I have listed the methods that seem to be most commonly talked about. *I thought this should go in Technical but they don't allow for polls in there. |
RE: Tuning with just one method
paper
|
RE: Tuning with just one method
You left out broadhead tune, which would be my vote. Eyeball everything and/or set it up with levels, shoot groups to get it sighted with target tips, then screw on the broadheads and dial it in.
For my target only bows its a combination of paper then walk back. I guess my final answer is; There is no "just one method". |
RE: Tuning with just one method
from what I've been told, the paper is the most concise...
|
RE: Tuning with just one method
Honestly? If you're getting good, consistent groups.....what difference does anything else make?
|
RE: Tuning with just one method
ORIGINAL: Western MA Hunter from what I've been told, the paper is the most concise... |
RE: Tuning with just one method
ORIGINAL: KodiakArcher You left out broadhead tune, I chose barshaft because I can use that to tune at a distance and it gives me the feedback about my spine, also at a distance,that I like. I should have asked for folks to describe why they would make the choice they would make. |
RE: Tuning with just one method
ORIGINAL: GMMAT Honestly? If you're getting good, consistent groups.....what difference does anything else make? |
RE: Tuning with just one method
ORIGINAL: KodiakArcher I guess my final answer is; There is no "just one method". Come on now, pick just one. |
RE: Tuning with just one method
ORIGINAL: KodiakArcher ORIGINAL: Western MA Hunter from what I've been told, the paper is the most concise... True, but that is why I walk back tune after I paper tune. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:34 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.