HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Bowhunting (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting-18/)
-   -   Gross vs Net (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting/227320-gross-vs-net.html)

Charlie P 01-15-2008 09:03 AM

Gross vs Net
 
What is the point of a net score?

A buck grows what he grows and nothing is perfect in nature so why make all these deductions on antlers ?



_Dan 01-15-2008 09:05 AM

RE: Gross vs Net
 
I've been trying to figure that out for a long time. Makes zero sense.

Vabowman 01-15-2008 09:05 AM

RE: Gross vs Net
 
I don't know either. Why a drying period???

125py 01-15-2008 09:06 AM

RE: Gross vs Net
 
I 100% agree. Nets are for fishing, soccer, hockey, basketball, etc......they have no place in the whitetail world in my opinion

MN/Kyle 01-15-2008 09:07 AM

RE: Gross vs Net
 
There is no point IMO.

I prob started out as a pissin' match. "My buck is bigger than yours because..."

But I have no idea.

BTBowhunter 01-15-2008 09:09 AM

RE: Gross vs Net
 
I think the intent was to recognize symmetry and perfection but I personally dont agree with the idea of subtracting from the score.

As CarlieP said: A buck grows what he grows!

IAhuntr 01-15-2008 09:24 AM

RE: Gross vs Net
 
Another thumbs down for deductions here, especially in scoring a non-typical! They deduct for differences in the mainframe while adding theinches that shouldn't be there at all anyway, howredundant is that!??While Iappreciate the beauty in a perfectly symmetrical rack, I'd prefer more antler inchesover symmetry any day of the week. Anytime I see a deer harvest published, I only pay attention to the gross score as that more accurately tells me what he actually looked like.

huntingson 01-15-2008 09:29 AM

RE: Gross vs Net
 
There is a guy who owns an archery shop about 30 minutes from my house who has started his own scoring system that has no deductions. In order to be "typical" one side cannot be x-inches (I can't remember) different than the other. If it is it is just scored as a non-typical, but there are still no deductions. I really like that system. P&Y and B&C scoring systems are junk. The head of P&Y's score keeping actually stated that the more symmetric the rack, the better rack it was. Can you imagine that? Actually thinking that one rack is better than another. That is like judging snow flakes.

shed33 01-15-2008 09:33 AM

RE: Gross vs Net
 
Gross score gives them credit where credit is due, thats forsure. Net was originally and still should be intended for horns, not antlers.

Sliverflicker 01-15-2008 09:35 AM

RE: Gross vs Net
 
I never was to keen on the net score. I can see the drying period.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:02 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.