Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

Gross vs Net

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-15-2008, 09:03 AM
  #1  
Boone & Crockett
Thread Starter
 
Charlie P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,137
Default Gross vs Net

What is the point of a net score?

A buck grows what he grows and nothing is perfect in nature so why make all these deductions on antlers ?


Charlie P is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 09:05 AM
  #2  
 
Vabowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast, Va
Posts: 3,965
Default RE: Gross vs Net

I don't know either. Why a drying period???
Vabowman is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 09:05 AM
  #3  
 
_Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wisconsin and Canada
Posts: 2,415
Default RE: Gross vs Net

I've been trying to figure that out for a long time. Makes zero sense.
_Dan is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 09:06 AM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
125py's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: S. Illinois
Posts: 1,325
Default RE: Gross vs Net

I 100% agree. Nets are for fishing, soccer, hockey, basketball, etc......they have no place in the whitetail world in my opinion
125py is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 09:07 AM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
MN/Kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,911
Default RE: Gross vs Net

There is no point IMO.

I prob started out as a pissin' match. "My buck is bigger than yours because..."

But I have no idea.
MN/Kyle is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 09:09 AM
  #6  
Giant Nontypical
 
BTBowhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW PA USA
Posts: 7,220
Default RE: Gross vs Net

I think the intent was to recognize symmetry and perfection but I personally dont agree with the idea of subtracting from the score.

As CarlieP said: A buck grows what he grows!
BTBowhunter is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 09:24 AM
  #7  
Typical Buck
 
IAhuntr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 721
Default RE: Gross vs Net

Another thumbs down for deductions here, especially in scoring a non-typical! They deduct for differences in the mainframe while adding theinches that shouldn't be there at all anyway, howredundant is that!??While Iappreciate the beauty in a perfectly symmetrical rack, I'd prefer more antler inchesover symmetry any day of the week. Anytime I see a deer harvest published, I only pay attention to the gross score as that more accurately tells me what he actually looked like.
IAhuntr is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 09:29 AM
  #8  
Nontypical Buck
 
huntingson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southwest Ohio
Posts: 2,849
Default RE: Gross vs Net

There is a guy who owns an archery shop about 30 minutes from my house who has started his own scoring system that has no deductions. In order to be "typical" one side cannot be x-inches (I can't remember) different than the other. If it is it is just scored as a non-typical, but there are still no deductions. I really like that system. P&Y and B&C scoring systems are junk. The head of P&Y's score keeping actually stated that the more symmetric the rack, the better rack it was. Can you imagine that? Actually thinking that one rack is better than another. That is like judging snow flakes.
huntingson is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 09:33 AM
  #9  
Nontypical Buck
 
shed33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Idaho's Panhandle
Posts: 4,436
Default RE: Gross vs Net

Gross score gives them credit where credit is due, thats forsure. Net was originally and still should be intended for horns, not antlers.
shed33 is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 09:35 AM
  #10  
Nontypical Buck
 
Sliverflicker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,288
Default RE: Gross vs Net

I never was to keen on the net score. I can see the drying period.
Sliverflicker is offline  


Quick Reply: Gross vs Net


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.