Md has a hunter harresment law. I hope if anyone has a run in with these luns to call DNR themself's if they are legal. Balt Sun isn't worth the paper it's printed on. I wonder if this womenare familiar with the Wisconsin tragety.

The Sun is a horrible excuse for a quality newspaper. Let these two broads come into the woods I'm in.

In the woods I hunt in MD, we have had problems with people trying to harass us while hunting. Thankfully no one has made any attempts to come into the woods, but it still gets under your skin. [:@]

Two nut job lesbians in MD who hate hunters will get print in the leftist Baltimore Sun, but anything that is pro hunting is ignored. They represent the minority of course, but the Sun realizes that if they can portray all hunters as law-breaking fawn killers, many fence sitters will side with the antis. It's typical of the Sun and their far left views on everything. If I didn't get it for free, I'd never read it.

in a way i am glad she is out there stoping tresspassers and buchers but the hole anti huntering thing makes them seem stupid but they are so screw them when i get my first deer i will send them a pic lol

one of these mornings there going to come up on someone there ruining ther hunt and it will be the most dangers game and i bet the tree huggen hippy losses

What annoys me the most is the sun tries to portray this as the rule in MD. I have met more than my share of liberal anti-hunters lunitics in MD. But I have met some hardcore hunters too. In fact, if it wasn't for Baltimore City,PG and Montgomery counties, you would think this state was extremely prohunting.

I think the point that is being missed is that these twoarerunningpoachers out of a restricted area, nothunters who have the rights/permission to hunt this land.Yes, I agree that theytake it to the extreme, but if these poachers are hunting an area where hunting is not allowed, can you really feel sorry for them? Just my 2 cents.

-Rick C.

Thats BS as the story is. They portray it as they have to constantly run off hunters, when truth be known, they found a doe wounded once that was shot on an adjacent farm, and wanted to get thier story out and made up some serious crap. And of course the idiots at the sun, and the other left winged idiots will believe and swallow any story that gets hunters upset.

These women are complete nutjobs. But the bigger picture is the so called scumbag poachers and trespassers that enabled this to become a story in the first place.

If we didn't have the lowlife trespassing poachers, all we'd have is two lesbos watching deer from their porch. There would be no story to print! Once again, it's the lowlifes in our own ranks that are making life difficult for the rest of us.

Correct me if I'm wrong, Bigcountry - but aren't you one of the right-wing psychopaths who is always preaching about"Landowner's Rights," "zero tolerance for trespassers" and "limited government intrusion in private matters."

You cry when the government tells you what to do. Now you cry when the government lets people do what they want to do with their own land.

Well... They own it. They can do what they want.

If you wanna cry about it - you might wanna finance your own little slice of paradise.

I disagree. The story reads to non-hunters that this couple has to adjust their work schedule to keep trespassers out of their property. The few articles non-hunters read on an annual basis always paint a bad picture of hunters.

In the article they said a couple of things that should embarrass real hunters: First the buck was shot in the head with an arrow, and secondly a deer had it leg shot off. Whether it is true or not that is what people believe is happening. If it is true there is no excuse to shoot a deer in the head with an arrow.

Remember perception is realty to the non-hunters.