Preferences..single or dual cam?
07-30-2007 | 08:40 PM
#21
Nontypical Buck
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,679
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
RE: Preferences..single or dual cam?
ORIGINAL: davepjr71
You'll have to read the literature from Ross and Bowtech if you want a more technical explanation since I didn't create the design just understand what they've done and why it is a smart idea.
You'll have to read the literature from Ross and Bowtech if you want a more technical explanation since I didn't create the design just understand what they've done and why it is a smart idea.
ORIGINAL: davepjr71
Why use a band-aid system of tweaking cables sides and such when it is not required with a proper design?
Why use a band-aid system of tweaking cables sides and such when it is not required with a proper design?
) and now your perfectly machined cable track on that cam doesn't mean squat. I prefer the ability to tune perfectly for an absolutely true 0 cam lean using a harness......this is the only way I am guaranteed to have 0 cam lean. That's like saying why have a way to adjust the alignment on your car.......it should be manufactured that way and if not ability to adjust for it is a bandaid.
ORIGINAL: davepjr71
Each cable on my Allegiance is only 38" long. That adds up to only 76" of cable. That's not significantlymore than just about any bow.All cables cross twice on most compounds whether you have 1 continuous cable or 2. Therefore, I'm not sure how you determined that there is significantly more length? Is there design on a single cam bow that just has 1 cable between both the idler and the cam with out crossing back down?
Each cable on my Allegiance is only 38" long. That adds up to only 76" of cable. That's not significantlymore than just about any bow.All cables cross twice on most compounds whether you have 1 continuous cable or 2. Therefore, I'm not sure how you determined that there is significantly more length? Is there design on a single cam bow that just has 1 cable between both the idler and the cam with out crossing back down?
ORIGINAL: Germ
No design is "better" these days IMO. Put a good set of stings and cables in them and they all work great.
No design is "better" these days IMO. Put a good set of stings and cables in them and they all work great.
With that said, assuming quality string/cables and a good tune they all will accomplish the same thing. If you prefer to associate yourself with one type or another then that is cool, just don't use bad info to poke holes in the others..........
07-30-2007 | 08:49 PM
#22
Boone & Crockett
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,682
Likes: 0
From: Michigan/Ohio
RE: Preferences..single or dual cam?
ORIGINAL: davepjr71
Germ,
They made the single cam in the mid 90's right? I saw one in 1 of the old Bowhunter magazines I have.
ORIGINAL: Germ
Hoyt made a single cam with dual idler wheel. It had two cables.
Hoyt made a single cam with dual idler wheel. It had two cables.
They made the single cam in the mid 90's right? I saw one in 1 of the old Bowhunter magazines I have.
07-30-2007 | 08:50 PM
#23
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,673
Likes: 0
From: Northeast Tennessee
RE: Preferences..single or dual cam?
Good strings and cables will prevent alot of problems and hassle in the long run. As far as cam lean on a single cam bow, I know my Ross doesn't have any, nor have I heard of any other Ross's having cam lean issues. Most of the cam lean issues I have seen come in the shop were either on the older Bowtechs, or the OLD dual cam bows, such as the PSE's, HCA's, etc.
07-30-2007 | 08:56 PM
#24
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,634
Likes: 0
From: HENDERSON KY USA
RE: Preferences..single or dual cam?
ORIGINAL: ArrowMike
I have never seen that.You have to post a photo.
ORIGINAL: Germ
Hoyt made a single cam with dual idler wheel. It had two cables.
Hoyt made a single cam with dual idler wheel. It had two cables.
It was in 2002,I am fairly sure and I loved the design but never owned one.I bought a cam 1/2 the next year.
Great design,vertical tracking,short cables and strings.
07-30-2007 | 08:58 PM
#25
Nontypical Buck
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,679
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
RE: Preferences..single or dual cam?
ORIGINAL: Rick James
even if the single cams had more overall length of string/cable then it would be spreading the load over more length and reduces overall load on each........thus reducing chances for creep. This is why dual cam shoot through systems pretty much never go out of time.......4x cables and a string to spread the load over.
even if the single cams had more overall length of string/cable then it would be spreading the load over more length and reduces overall load on each........thus reducing chances for creep. This is why dual cam shoot through systems pretty much never go out of time.......4x cables and a string to spread the load over.
07-30-2007 | 08:59 PM
#26
Boone & Crockett
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,682
Likes: 0
From: Michigan/Ohio
RE: Preferences..single or dual cam?
Ok here is ok Picture. Mine is in the in the shed. I am too lazy to get it.
I bought(Pro formed) in 2002 UltraTec with Excel cam.
4cam options
Redline(single)
Versa(single)
Excel(single)
Command(Dual)
I bought(Pro formed) in 2002 UltraTec with Excel cam.
4cam options
Redline(single)
Versa(single)
Excel(single)
Command(Dual)
07-30-2007 | 10:22 PM
#27
Site Bouncer
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
RE: Preferences..single or dual cam?
ORIGINAL: Cougars09
Good strings and cables will prevent alot of problems and hassle in the long run. As far as cam lean on a single cam bow, I know my Ross doesn't have any, nor have I heard of any other Ross's having cam lean issues. Most of the cam lean issues I have seen come in the shop were either on the older Bowtechs, or the OLD dual cam bows, such as the PSE's, HCA's, etc.
Good strings and cables will prevent alot of problems and hassle in the long run. As far as cam lean on a single cam bow, I know my Ross doesn't have any, nor have I heard of any other Ross's having cam lean issues. Most of the cam lean issues I have seen come in the shop were either on the older Bowtechs, or the OLD dual cam bows, such as the PSE's, HCA's, etc.
Remember that even that does not assure no lean as the dynamics of the cam/wheel and the pressures against it by the cable guard pulling the cables aside during the draw and at full draw can and do change.
All that being said, I prefer single cam bows. I feel they are more forgiving to tune and tend to stay tuned longer. Even the best of strings can creep in severe climate changes. I think a single cam set up will be more forgiving than a dual, hybrid or binary set up would be....just my.02
07-31-2007 | 04:42 AM
#29
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 0
From: Balt, MD (orig: J-town,PA) The bowels of Hell!!!
RE: Preferences..single or dual cam?
ORIGINAL: Rick James
Ross doesn't make a slaved "binary" bow. To my knowledge the bows using this design or ones close to it with a slaved cam include Bowtech, Kodiak, Elite, Darton, High Country, and Alpine. Ross does not. Some have better solutions for cam lean than others. Bowtech's new binary on the guardian and Dartons floating yoke on their pro series bows that is attached to both sides of the cam with dual take up tracks are at the top of the pack here though in my opinion only.
Because a manufacturing process that allows for 100% or probably even 90% of bows to have cam bushings and limb holes manufactured with tight enough tolerances for 0 cam lean with no way to adjust for it is way too expensive for bow manufacturers. I would venture to say that not a single one of them has these types of tolerance specs today to accomplish even 95% of their production to achieve true 0 cam lean off the production line. Add in a cable guard that is epoxied in place (or allen screw) that wrenches everything over in a different spot on each bow (check the tolerances of cable guard positions on 10 identical model bows ) and now your perfectly machined cable track on that cam doesn't mean squat. I prefer the ability to tune perfectly for an absolutely true 0 cam lean using a harness......this is the only way I am guaranteed to have 0 cam lean. That's like saying why have a way to adjust the alignment on your car.......it should be manufactured that way and if not ability to adjust for it is a bandaid.
To give you an idea.......on a Switchback XT string length is 87 3/4", cable is 33 1/2". Overall combined string/cable length that is under load is a moot point.......even if the single cams had more overall length of string/cable then it would be spreading the load over more length and reduces overall load on each........thus reducing chances for creep. This is why dual cam shoot through systems pretty much never go out of time.......4x cables and a string to spread the load over.
Best piece of advice on here yet.........
With that said, assuming quality string/cables and a good tune they all will accomplish the same thing. If you prefer to associate yourself with one type or another then that is cool, just don't use bad info to poke holes in the others..........
ORIGINAL: davepjr71
You'll have to read the literature from Ross and Bowtech if you want a more technical explanation since I didn't create the design just understand what they've done and why it is a smart idea.
You'll have to read the literature from Ross and Bowtech if you want a more technical explanation since I didn't create the design just understand what they've done and why it is a smart idea.
ORIGINAL: davepjr71
Why use a band-aid system of tweaking cables sides and such when it is not required with a proper design?
Why use a band-aid system of tweaking cables sides and such when it is not required with a proper design?
) and now your perfectly machined cable track on that cam doesn't mean squat. I prefer the ability to tune perfectly for an absolutely true 0 cam lean using a harness......this is the only way I am guaranteed to have 0 cam lean. That's like saying why have a way to adjust the alignment on your car.......it should be manufactured that way and if not ability to adjust for it is a bandaid.
ORIGINAL: davepjr71
Each cable on my Allegiance is only 38" long. That adds up to only 76" of cable. That's not significantlymore than just about any bow.All cables cross twice on most compounds whether you have 1 continuous cable or 2. Therefore, I'm not sure how you determined that there is significantly more length? Is there design on a single cam bow that just has 1 cable between both the idler and the cam with out crossing back down?
Each cable on my Allegiance is only 38" long. That adds up to only 76" of cable. That's not significantlymore than just about any bow.All cables cross twice on most compounds whether you have 1 continuous cable or 2. Therefore, I'm not sure how you determined that there is significantly more length? Is there design on a single cam bow that just has 1 cable between both the idler and the cam with out crossing back down?
ORIGINAL: Germ
No design is "better" these days IMO. Put a good set of stings and cables in them and they all work great.
No design is "better" these days IMO. Put a good set of stings and cables in them and they all work great.
With that said, assuming quality string/cables and a good tune they all will accomplish the same thing. If you prefer to associate yourself with one type or another then that is cool, just don't use bad info to poke holes in the others..........
You stated that the binaries have way more cables in ojne of your posts. However, you then state that string and cable the are about the same.
Bowtech will replace the limbs or cams if the bows have any cam lean. Most cable guard rods are fixed position now. I'm not sure why you think they all wrench over in a different position like they were in the past? The only way they could be different is if you replace the stock cable guard slide.
You start talking about single cam spreading the load and then jump to dual cams. You're all over the map. The binary cams are also slaved together and the load is spread evenly over both cables and the string. My marks on my cams haven't moved at all since I bought the bow and are still in sync.
I'm not associating with any particular thing or person. Furthermore, please don't start telling me what to do on here. It's getting old with the people who seem to act like mods. If you disagree then state your opinions without calling me out.
07-31-2007 | 04:47 AM
#30
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 0
From: Balt, MD (orig: J-town,PA) The bowels of Hell!!!
RE: Preferences..single or dual cam?
ORIGINAL: Germ
I bought it in 2002 it only came out for 1 year(I think). In 2003 1.5 cams came out.
ORIGINAL: davepjr71
Germ,
They made the single cam in the mid 90's right? I saw one in 1 of the old Bowhunter magazines I have.
ORIGINAL: Germ
Hoyt made a single cam with dual idler wheel. It had two cables.
Hoyt made a single cam with dual idler wheel. It had two cables.
They made the single cam in the mid 90's right? I saw one in 1 of the old Bowhunter magazines I have.