So a guy just got pulled by a hni employee that was trying to make an argument for WHA?> Wow, are you guys in for a reality check with that is going to come soon.

you dont actually think an idea that brilliant regardless of whether or not i even find it that great is not going to the moon?Well, whatever i am a facts guy, sorry i am not interested in a bunch of bashers that cry and moan.

So did an employee/actual moderator pull a guy off for saying WHA was alright? Huh, i just signed up and rule 16 said there will be no belittling/bashing or whatever itsaid of another one's brand. I will forward this to WHA and let them know that you do not follow the rules which you demand on your site of others. Let them take legal action with you for all i care.

I am saddened to learn that this is the way HNI does business. all credibility has been lost! im sure you guys will just delete this email as well, G for bid you kept things balanced and honest.

While you are checking out rules, reread #s 5 and 17.
This is not a public forum so you don't actually have a "right" of free speach, and all of their editing decisions are final.

No - it was brought to their attention said poster was in fact a person previously banned for life who had snuck back in, That poster also had left for personal "moral/ethical" reasons vowing never to return.

Your reaction shows you are yet another wha defender/employee/or principal, showing up here and registering for the sole purpose of promoting this sick agenda. Our opinions are considered bashing and whining by you and yet you present NO facts or answer any of the questions I asked.

Now thats funny - can't win hunters over with the concept of your wrestling type canned darting show concept so you will take legal action to force it on us? Sounds like a plan for failure to me.

Answer questions, show us how hunting is broken, and present a logical( non reality show) fix for it and maybe some will listen. Keep selling whatt you got and hunters will continue to tell you it is crap.

Steve (no hidden identity)

Very nice Steve, good post....I love these newbies jumping in strictly to push their WHA on others who are clearly against the WHA and all it's concepts. Especially when they have no knowledge of HNI, it's business and it's members....what a ignorant sportsman.

Disclaimer, look up the definition of ignorant.

I also think we need to take a stand on canned hunting while we are at it.... I'm not talking about high fence hunting, some of that can be fair chase, I'm talking about true canned hunting.......

If you're just here to rattle our cage, don't bother.

There is no ethical way to justify the WHA. Open debate is one thing, but these people are just spouting the same stuff over and over. Since that's not working, now they're trying to discredit us. Sounds alot like a political campaign. Am I the only one that that bothers me? [:'(]

No Davoh, your not alone.

I would use that word loosely. These guys aren't sportsman. HCH

Here's another question

Where is the data you guys claimed to have, that shows non-hunters support the WHA?

I would like to see this data, and contact the folks it was tested on to see what they were really told.

WITHOUT GETTING INTO A BIG LONG STORY ABOUT THIS ,IT SEEMS ALOT OF US HAVE THE SAME ANSERWS,OR FELLINGS ABOUT THIS BUT IAM TOTALLY AGAINST THIS [:'(]