Here's a thought.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

09-26-2005 | 04:07 PM

#11

QTompkins2005

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 779

Likes: 0

From: Iowa

RE: Here's a thought.

that would be pretty awesome, bud i'd have to say if its bad for the deer then i'm against it.

09-26-2005 | 06:19 PM

#12

TimDevlin

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 64

Likes: 0

RE: Here's a thought.

Not only is it bad for the deer...getting tranquilized too much kills them anyway. But just imagine the first time a tranquilized-drunk deer stumbles into the road and causes a fatal accident. Bad for hunters then.
Tim

09-26-2005 | 06:22 PM

#13

PABowhntr

Boone & Crockett

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 12,157

Likes: 0

From: Lehigh County PA USA

RE: Here's a thought.

I like the thought behind it though I think the others mentioned a few reasons why it probably would never get the green light.

09-26-2005 | 07:01 PM

#14

dkeener

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 296

Likes: 0

From: South Bend IN

RE: Here's a thought.

Wow, interesting question. It is too bad there isn't an equivalent of a catch and release type situation. Sure would be fun to plunk a bunch of them in the ribs without the arrow actually penetrating the hide.