NAP Razorbak
#11
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kodiak, AK
Posts: 2,877
RE: NAP Razorbak
I used the Razorbak 125's for a couple years and had some problems with them so I've since switched to the Montec. The Razorbak tends to have a sweet spot in it where you can get it in perfect alignment with the shaft but if you rotate the head off that spot it's out of alignment. The other problem was sharpening them. I'm pretty proficient at sharpening but I could never get anything on the bleeder blades to get them sharp at all. They also aren't very durable and are very expensive. In all, I'd spend my money elsewhere like on a good set of HellRazors or Montecs (and sharpening stones). If you can put an edge on a knife you can easily put a good edge on a 3 blade monolithic broadhead, the angles are preset by design.
#12
RE: NAP Razorbak
I'm not going to say they are the absolute best head on the market. I don't like testing alot of different heads on game to see if work well or not. I have taken 4 deer with my razorbak 100's. 2 went down within eyesight 30yds or less, good hits. Other 2 weren't perfect hits, but both died & recovered within 100yds. I have yet to loose a deer using them, and like said had 2 that hits weren't like I prefer, but did the job well. How can you ask for anything more!!!!
#13
RE: NAP Razorbak
if you want a cut on contact head check out the magnus line. i'm thinking about trying the buzz cuts next year and slick trick is coming out with a coc head too. it hits the market june 1st heres a pics. of it.