Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Black Powder
Duplexing For BH209 >

Duplexing For BH209

Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Duplexing For BH209

Old 12-21-2016, 06:07 AM
  #11  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,585
Default

Originally Posted by bronko22000
Don't know if I would do it but I don't see any harm in doing it either. If I don't have a reliable ignition (AKA 209) I wont use BH209.
But on a side note I've been having some good success with Black MZ powder. It's been shooting great on the range and firing 3 shots on game has resulted in two deer and one hog. (one deer and the hog were DRT and the other deer didn't travel very far). Loading is easy and cleaning between shots like 209 is not necessary. But unlike BH209 it ignites reliably with #11 caps.
Where did you get the idea that BH 209 needs to be cleaned between shots? My accuracy experiments show that as a mistake.
lemoyne is offline  
Old 12-21-2016, 06:11 AM
  #12  
Nontypical Buck
 
BarnesAddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Near a lake with no fish
Posts: 1,077
Default

Originally Posted by lemoyne
Where did you get the idea that BH 209 needs to be cleaned between shots? My accuracy experiments show that as a mistake.
In most cases it doesn't need to be swabbed between shots, especially for hunting. However, if you're shooting for the smallest possible groups, it should be swabbed to maintain consistent, repeatable accuracy. The most accurate shooter I know who uses BH209, swabs between each shot.
BarnesAddict is offline  
Old 12-21-2016, 12:22 PM
  #13  
Spike
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 70
Default

Originally Posted by bronko22000
Don't know if I would do it but I don't see any harm in doing it either. If I don't have a reliable ignition (AKA 209) I wont use BH209.
But on a side note I've been having some good success with Black MZ powder. It's been shooting great on the range and firing 3 shots on game has resulted in two deer and one hog. (one deer and the hog were DRT and the other deer didn't travel very far). Loading is easy and cleaning between shots like 209 is not necessary. But unlike BH209 it ignites reliably with #11 caps.
Originally Posted by lemoyne
Where did you get the idea that BH 209 needs to be cleaned between shots? My accuracy experiments show that as a mistake.
I read that as MZ powder doesn't need to be cleaned between shots like 209.
zmason1002 is offline  
Old 12-21-2016, 04:24 PM
  #14  
Spike
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 56
Default

Originally Posted by super_hunt54
Okay boys and girls. It's time to put our thinking caps on for a minute. I just read about a little trick that I may just give a wack at but I'd like to get some opinions or experiences first. I've read a couple posts on another site that some are loading 3-4 grains FFFG down the barrel before a load of BH in their inlines with #11 caps (one was a White Super 91) and getting reliable ignition!! Bronko had a NIB White Super 91 that I passed on for 2 reasons. 1: plunger/bolt type receivers and my sausage fingers just don't get along well without a primer tool. 2: #11 percussion type rifles won't reliably fire BH209 and if I'm using an inline, I want to use the best performing powder on the market. Now I'm kinda kicking myself in the butt for passing on a great deal on a rifle that could have very well surpassed the full bore bullet performance of my TC Pro Hunter barrel (no easy task there) that would also be "western compliant"!! Any of you guys with Whites ever tried this little trick??
We are very fortunate in the USA to have many different powders available to try. Doubt any powder manufacture would recommend mixing powders. So, proceed with caution, especially in a plunger style gun.
52bore is offline  
Old 12-22-2016, 05:15 PM
  #15  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: idaho falls idaho
Posts: 131
Default

I've used 5grns of 3f black with bh 209 in my whites .not a problem and its pretty accurate.
deepcreek is offline  
Old 12-22-2016, 08:13 PM
  #16  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
super_hunt54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,695
Default

Originally Posted by deepcreek
I've used 5grns of 3f black with bh 209 in my whites .not a problem and its pretty accurate.
Guess I'm going to have to join the vast group looking for a Thunderbolt. Pref. a .451 but would think hard on a .504. Would absolutely LOVE a .451 with a 1:18-1:20 twist or a .504 in 1:20!!
super_hunt54 is offline  
Old 12-23-2016, 04:57 AM
  #17  
Fork Horn
 
GoexBlackhorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 195
Default

Originally Posted by deepcreek
I've used 5grns of 3f black with bh 209 in my whites .not a problem and its pretty accurate.
I agree..... nothing to worry about.... ie.... Goex FFF.
I just wouldn;t advise using Blackhorn in a plunger. But in a sidelock?...... five grains down the chute and add a little more under the nipple, should be fine. But good ignition would depend on the condition and design of the sidelock - quality of the nipple and cap.... and I would never exceed 95gr loose Blackhorn volume, in a 50-cal sidelock.
GoexBlackhorn is offline  
Old 01-03-2017, 07:36 PM
  #18  
Spike
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 83
Default

BH209 in a plunger style gun reminded me of this post:

http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/black-powder/407995-black-diamond-t-c-blackhorn-209-a.html#post4267479

I realize this is about using #11 caps, but could the same thing happen?
Bill308 is offline  
Old 01-03-2017, 11:27 PM
  #19  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
super_hunt54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,695
Default

Yeah it could Bill. I'm just saying to heck with the idea and look for a Thunderbolt after I pee the wife off and order a Swinglock .45 speedy twist Or have a custom .50 1:20 twist built if I can't find a good .50 Thunderbolt.
super_hunt54 is offline  
Old 01-04-2017, 06:02 AM
  #20  
Giant Nontypical
 
Gm54-120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,605
Default

Doc White tested BH209 in a Thunderbolt.

Read the bottom paragraphs. All he did was adjust head space and added a vent liner to the breach plug.

http://whitemuzzleloading.com/shooti...e-thunderbolt/

Doc thought pretty highly of BH209 in a Thunderbolt.
http://whitemuzzleloading.com/interview-with-doc/
All of the above is nonsense if you are using a ThunderBolt with 209 ignition. Blackhorn 209 is hands down the best in the ThunderBolt. BT209 is a smokeless powder of course, they say with a few additives but they won’t say what the additives are. It acts a lot like the 8400 that I experimented with way back when. It is not at all like the 5744 that I took to Africa. Be that as it may, it works like a charm in the T-Bolt, producing great velocities with 300 -450 grain saboted bullets. I have not yet tried it with heavy slip fit bullets

Last edited by Gm54-120; 01-04-2017 at 06:18 AM.
Gm54-120 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.