Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Flounder' 500 Grain Boolit

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-20-2015 | 03:50 PM
  #11  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,926
Likes: 0
From: Saxonburg Pa
Default

Originally Posted by sabotloader
Ron,

The powder charge of 80g is a way plenty for this boolit.

You are correct especially with BH. Your 80 grain load is a full hunting load with that bullet or actually most any bullet over 350 grains. Properties of 'progressive burning' BH approach maximum efficiency of the bullet.

IMO using 80 grains of BH on that bullet would be comparable with using 120 grains of BH on the other bullets you have been testing - sort of screws the testing process as far as comparisons.
When you consider the load on that bullet, it really didn't penetrate that well. When shooting a 500grn bullet and 80grns of bh it's really a stout load. Probably more so then me shooting 140grns with a 200grn bullet. You definitely can't compare to the other bullets tested but a lot of bullets penetrated further anyway. I seen several hogs shot with those big heavy conicals with very poor results. I think I see why now, they just didnt penetrate enough.
But I do think that bullet would blow any Deer over for sure.
Grouse45 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2015 | 04:24 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,186
Likes: 0
From: Boncarbo,Colorado
Default

A bullet that big sure did a number back in the day of the buffalo hunter.
MountainDevil54 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2015 | 05:00 PM
  #13  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,926
Likes: 0
From: Saxonburg Pa
Default

Originally Posted by flounder33
Thanks Ron,
Well, it held together pretty well. I thought it might make it to the phone book. The other ones, (my lightweights), should be easier on things.
Art
Flounder,
I have no clue how or where to start making bullets. But I'm curious why you make such a blunt nose on that bullet?
Grouse45 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2015 | 05:17 PM
  #14  
Semisane's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,918
Likes: 1
From: River Ridge, LA (Suburb of New Orleans)
Default

Originally Posted by Grouse45
Flounder,
I have no clue how or where to start making bullets. But I'm curious why you make such a blunt nose on that bullet?
On non-hollowpoint cast bullets, the bigger the meplat the more effective the bullet is on game. This is true for both hard cast and soft cast bullets.

Pointy cast bullets have a bad reputation for penciling through with insufficient shock effect.
Semisane is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2015 | 05:23 PM
  #15  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,926
Likes: 0
From: Saxonburg Pa
Default

Originally Posted by Semisane
On non-hollowpoint cast bullets, the bigger the meplat the more effective the bullet is on game. This is true for both hard cast and soft cast bullets.

Pointy cast bullets have a bad reputation for penciling through with insufficient shock effect.
Thanks Semi, I have some hunterman lead bullets and they are all more pointy. I don't remember shooting anything with them.
Grouse45 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2015 | 06:40 PM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, South Dakota
Default

Originally Posted by cayugad
If you could, how far did that conical expand to?.....
At the widest, the mushroom is 1/64" less than 7/8"; if one wishes to say it has expanded to 7/8" that is close enough.
ronlaughlin is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2015 | 06:44 PM
  #17  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default



This hog shot by Ed Mehlig seemed to think that lead conicals work pretty well
flounder33 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2015 | 06:48 PM
  #18  
sabotloader's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,703
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by ronlaughlin
At the widest, the mushroom is 1/64" less than 7/8"; if one wishes to say it has expanded to 7/8" that is close enough.
That really is pretty normal for a 50 cal. heavy lead conical. And normally the expansion occurs below the nose of the bullet through 1st and 2nd band of the bullet.

At that point the meplat has become so wide that it really slows the velocity and energy of the bullet - but normally by that time the bullet has done its work.

The really GREAT thing in my mind is that those large lead conicals do not 'PANCAKE' or blow up like the lighter lead conicals.
sabotloader is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2015 | 06:51 PM
  #19  
Gm54-120's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,612
Likes: 0
Default

Sectional density of 0.281 with a bullet weight of 500 and diameter of .504".

Thats pretty stout but not as good as a .451 460gr.

Sectional density of 0.323 with a bullet weight of 460 and diameter of .451".
Gm54-120 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-2015 | 06:55 PM
  #20  
sabotloader's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,703
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by flounder33


This hog shot by Ed Mehlig seemed to think that lead conicals work pretty well
Yet, I remember several years ago on one or more of the Hog Hunts that Big 6x6 and that crew went on somewhere down there and maybe you were a part of one of those expeditions - they really struggled with big lead conicals getting the job done on the big hogs they were shooting. I do not remember which ones they were using but it did not make many people happy on the hunt.
sabotloader is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.