HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Black Powder (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/black-powder-23/)
-   -   Musings Of A Retired Hunter & Shooter (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/black-powder/365085-musings-retired-hunter-shooter.html)

bronko22000 05-31-2012 03:04 AM

Semi - I would think that a 1:24 to 1:30 would work. I often thought of trying .451 bullets out of my GM LRH 45 barrel. Trouble is buying store bought they are probably cast too hard. And I don't want to get a mould just to see if they shoot.

Semisane 05-31-2012 08:16 AM

Doc White is a true gentleman. Yesterday I sent him an e-mail posing the question. He replied this morning.

Here's his reply.


LAND TO LAND SHOULD BE .430, GROOVES .035 DEEP, NO DEEPER THAN .040, TWIST
FOR THE 250 GR BULLET 1-32, NO FASTER THAN 1-28 FOR A 300 GR BULLET, hOWARD
KELLY IS YOUR BEST BET, AT WEBERTOWN RIFLEWORKS, ON THE NET. doc


Semisane 05-31-2012 08:54 AM


Trouble is buying store bought they are probably cast too hard.
Bronko, a little while ago I sent an e-mail to Hornady asking for the Brinnel hardness level of the Frontier line of cold swaged lead bullets. I load the Frontier .314/90 grain semi-wadcutters for light plinking loads in a .32 Mag handgun. They seem to be pretty soft and are pin-point accurate in my little revolver.


I often thought of trying .451 bullets out of my GM LRH 45 barrel.
Hornady has .452 and .454 bullets in the Frontier line, but no .451s. I don't know how the .452s would fit. See them here. http://www.hornady.com/store/Lead-Pi...ullets/?page=2

I had thought about going with the .45s for my little project. But the heaviest .452 is 230 grains and has a round nose profile, which is not what I want. The .454/255 grain flat point looks pretty darn good, but I decided to go with the .430 because it would give me the option of both a Semi Wad Cutter or SWC Hollow Point in 240 grain.

flounder33 05-31-2012 09:16 AM

Semi, I think that you are off one decimal place with the .035" groove depth. I am quite sure it should be .0035". I was off .0005" earlier when you asked the groove depth and I said I thought it was .003".

Semisane 05-31-2012 09:22 AM

Don't know Flounder. That .035 is a direct quote from Doc White's e-mail.

flounder33 05-31-2012 09:34 AM

Don't want to squabble at all Semi, but Doc may have made a typo. I know Knight rifles have a depth of groove of .005 to .006 and Doc's rifles have shallower grooves. Even deep grooved round ball shooting barrels have grooves that are only around .010.

Semisane 05-31-2012 09:47 AM

Not squabbling at all. I think you're right. Actually, I was surprised he recommended .430 land to land for the .429 bullet. I expected .429 or even something like .425.

(OOPS. Brain out of gear when I posted the above. The bullets are .430, not .429. Doc's recommendation would be an exact fit.)

flounder33 05-31-2012 09:52 AM

Here is a link to something doc wrote. I find it very informative.
http://www.whitemuzzleloading.com/my...oading_rif.htm

Semisane 05-31-2012 10:10 AM

Great link Flounder! Thanks. I've never seen that article before. Now I understand his thinking in recommending .430 land to land.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.