Need Advise on In Line?
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: USA
Ill be trying out In Line Muzzleloading this year ,for the first time.I only intend to use the In Line for Deer only,hunting from elevated stands,and ground blind' s.My intentions are to buy a Knight 45 Magnum Disc,because of the increased speed,and flatened Trajectory.Is the 45 caliber a wise choice,over the 50,or other calibers.The 45 should have plenty of power to crunch deer at all reasonable distances.Am i heading in the right direction,or do you have a better idea,as to Gun and Caliber? Thank' s!
#2
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 0
Knight is offering huge savings right now on the Knight Disc & Disc Magnum along with the original American Knight model because they' re phasing these models out. Since there inception, improvements have been made in newer models. I would suggest this model below for a few dollars more. If you need help finding the best price on-line, just start a new thread here or ask for help in this thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A GOOD KNIGHT' S DAY: " The Knight Disc Elite .50 caliber Review"
--------------- by Randy Wakeman -------------------
The tested example is the Knight .50 caliber " Disc Elite," featuring a tapered stainless steel barrel accompanied by a hardwoods camouflage synthetic stock. I' ll take the liberty of comparing this gun to a Knight " Disc Extreme" stainless / laminated .50 caliber that has been shot extensively over the last several months, and was examined thoroughly on a recently released videotape as well. Both guns feature Knight' s " full plastic jacket" 209 primer holder, and Knight' s " non C-Tool" bolt, which allows for finger only disassembly after removing the hex-head bolt stop screw. There is no sane reason for a bolt stop on this rifle that is not finger only removable. Both guns share the identical bolt-actions and breech plug design, and are 209-fired only. There is also no reason for the " secondary safety" on either the Extreme or Elite, as the action quickly jacks out the primed red plastic jacket and immobilizes the gun. The rattle-prone secondary safety likes to engage itself on its own, and is an annoying waste of threads on these two specific models. A drop of green Loctite is the fix, which is often called " small screw threadlocker" and is low strength.
In the past, I' ve paid homage to Tony Knight, for no one can hold a modern inline muzzleloader in their hands without saying a big " thank you" to Tony Knight. When the original Knight Dual Ignition System Concept (DISC) rifle was singled out by the BATF and classified as a GCA firearm, Tony Knight took them on essentially alone. And won. All subsequent makers of 209 fired inlines have since reaped the benefits. Tony Knight, together with Del Ramsey, made the inline and saboted projectile the most popular and fastest growing segments of muzzleloading rifles in the last fifteen years.
The Knight catalog boasts that the Elite is " 1/2 pound lighter," and lists its weight at 7 lbs., 5 ounces vs. the catalog weight of the Extreme at 7 lbs., 14 ounces. According to my Lyman electronic trigger gauge, that just isn' t so. Both guns are virtually identical in weight, a touch over 8 lbs. with scope bases installed, but sans ramrods. The answer is that the Knight laminate stocks are lighter than their more substantial synthetic offerings. Additionally, the barrel weight savings is more pronounced in .45 caliber models. Finally, the beefier forked recoil lug adds weight to the barrel assembly, but in a far better place. For all intents and purposes, the .50 caliber models of the Elite and Extreme are in the same weight class, around 8 lb. guns.
I' ve not considered the Knight Extreme to be a poor-handling gun, but the Elite really shines in comparison. The tapered barrel of the Elite, which comes equipped with no iron sights, makes the Elite a beautifully weighted, neutrally balanced gun. Side by side, the Extreme is a nose heavy pig by comparison. Yes, the Elite feels " that" good: like an entirely different gun! Normally, I don' t get too terribly impressed with camo stocks. However, the Elite' s hardwoods camouflage stock is strikingly handsome: the best looking synthetic stock I' ve seen on a muzzleloader. As opposed to the laminate, the molded checkering is functional as opposed to the " for show only" stippling arrangement on the laminated example. The recoil pad is generous, and well fitted in both cases. As many can attest, stock swelling is still an issue with laminated stocks, not so with quality synthetic stocks. The real world consideration has much to do with where you live and hunt.
One thing that has always impressed me about Knight Rifles is their customer service and tech support. Both Knight and Thompson are standouts in that regard. One of the benefits of owning a Knight is that a new Knight customer can ship their trigger to Knight, and Knight Rifles will adjust it to your specifications; shipping it back to you normally within 24 hours-- NO CHARGE. They ship back to the customer the same way you ship it to them: if you " next day it," they " next day it" back. " Priority Mail" it, that' s the way it is shipped back. I asked for a 3 lb. trigger, and they came very close: a 3 lb., 3 oz. repeatable break, with almost no take-up. Easily the best trigger I' ve ever pulled on a Knight, and one of the very best on any muzzleloader I' ve fired.
The gun was outfitted with Weaver " Grand Slam" steel bases, Warne QD medium height rings, and a Bushnell Elite 3200 3 x 9 x 40mm scope. The initial sight in took two shots at 25 yards, and the third shot was on the paper at 105 laser-verified yards. As was the case with the Extreme, the Knight Elite did not handle the standard 295 grain Powerbelt HP or Aero-tip Powerbelts well at all. These best I could ever get out of the Extreme was 4-1/4" groups or so. No matter what I tried with the Elite, I could get no tighter than 3-1/4" groups. Better than ever accomplished with the Extreme, but remarkably unremarkable. So, after 7 or 8 three-shot attempts, I went to the 405 grain Powerbelts. Bingo! The groups instantly shrunk to sub 1" and stayed there. As a point of comparison, trying most every combination I could think of over several months, the Knight Extreme hit the wall at about 2" . The Knight Elite sliced that by half, first day out. Triple 7 pellets or loose powder, it made no difference. Consistent MOA groups at 105 yards became the norm, with no barrel swabbing through 100 consecutive shots. I had brought out several other rifles to test, but I was having so much fun with the Knight Elite I shot it exclusively until well after sunset.
There have been several subsequent all-day shoots. I' ve been able to shoot the " Knight Powerbelts," which feature the Knight-only 260 grain bullet weight and a slightly modified gas check. Other than those differences, they are Powerbelt Aerotips with a red nose and a black gas check. Grouping at about 1-3/4 inches, they are a substantial improvement over the standard 245 grain and 295 grain Powerbelts in this rifle, which just never made it to 3 inches. However, they are distinctly inferior to the regular CVA-marketed 348 and 405 grain Powerbelts, which have given consistent 1 inch no swab groups at 100 yards.
The Knight Elite was a good candidate for Cecil Epp' s " Dead Center" sabots, which are astonishingly good. These high ballistic coefficient (.325) orange saboted 220 grain beauties are the easiest loading sabots I' ve ever used. As a point of comparison, a 405 grain Powerbelt has a B.C. of .257. Though conventional wisdom has suggested that thicker sabots can stick to the bullet, and affect accuracy, that is not the case with Cecil' s .40 caliber bullets. The sabots quickly flower and fall away, and ended up in a neat pile approximately 30 feet from the muzzle.
Following Cecil' s instructions, a fouling shot was fired first, with one lone spit patch between shots. Through several days of testing, the Dead Centers have not failed to group ½ inch or slightly better in this rifle, making them by far the most accurate bullets I have ever used, period. With moderate 100 grain Triple Seven pellet charges, the recoil is extremely mild;;feeling similar to my old Marlin " Camp 9" 9mm. Yet, even these loads chronographed at approximately 1800 fps. We were able to push these bullets all the way up to 2300 fps, but blown sabots were the result. The Dead Centers retained this level of accuracy up to over 2100 fps before starting to drop off. Congratulations to Cecil Epp and his boys for making believers out of all of us-- " Dead Center" is exactly what they do.
The Knight Extreme that I' ve shot so hard in the past has never failed to leave a thin scope coat of residue. After all this shooting with the Elite, I was amazed that though there was certainly blowback residue in the action, there was just a small fraction of what the Knight Extreme produced. I switched from Federal to Winchester to Remington primers, but no discernable scope residue. Thinking that Knight had hardened the plastic jackets somewhat, I used the remainder of the earliest red plastic jackets I had: still, no residue. Checking with Knight, I was assured that there has been no running production change. There are cumulative tolerances here, in both plastic jacket and nipple / breechplug. Call it luck of the draw.
As for the accuracy improvement, the Knight 2003 catalog says the Elite " has a unique bedded action for added accuracy." The action is in no way bedded that I can fathom, it is a forked recoil lug lying on plastic. However, the Knight press release of December 2002 is a bit more descriptive, mentioning the new cantilevered lug, which allows the barrel to be ' nearly free-floating." The Elite' s barrel does pass the " dollar bill test," exhibiting no contact from the muzzle down to where the barrel taper ends. When you tighten down the lone recoil lug, you can watch the barrel lift up and away from the stock. So, the fork attached to the recoil lug does indeed help with its larger footprint, and I suspect that offers the primary reason for the Elite' s better accuracy. The Extreme, on the other hand, has very heavy stock contact on one side of the barrel towards the muzzle, a wide gap on the other side. This can' t help.
The Knight Disc Elite is the most accurate, best handling Knight Rifle I' ve ever fired. A true 1" shooter out of the box with 348 gr. or 405 grain Powerbelts with no swabbing, it consistently shoots ½" or better with 220 grain Dead Center sabots. The combination of the Elite and Precision Rifle' s Dead Center bullets makes this the most consistently accurate muzzleloading gun I' ve ever tested. I' m impressed with the look, feel, accuracy, trigger, and contoured barrel of the Disc Elite. The longer, forked " cantilevered recoil lug" addresses, at least in part, what I have long felt was the Knight' s primary deficiency:a barreled action flaccidly attached to the stock by one wimpy lug and screw. While unorthodox, the results seem clear enough: It brings the Knight bolt action rifle up to a whole new level. This is the first Knight I can really wax enthusiastic about. It is the finest, best handling, most accurate Knight Rifle I' ve seen. As far as I' m concerned, the Knight Disc Elite .50 caliber is easily Knight' s best effort to date, and the rifle that finally deserves to have Tony Knight' s name on the side of it. My highest recommendation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A GOOD KNIGHT' S DAY: " The Knight Disc Elite .50 caliber Review"
--------------- by Randy Wakeman -------------------
The tested example is the Knight .50 caliber " Disc Elite," featuring a tapered stainless steel barrel accompanied by a hardwoods camouflage synthetic stock. I' ll take the liberty of comparing this gun to a Knight " Disc Extreme" stainless / laminated .50 caliber that has been shot extensively over the last several months, and was examined thoroughly on a recently released videotape as well. Both guns feature Knight' s " full plastic jacket" 209 primer holder, and Knight' s " non C-Tool" bolt, which allows for finger only disassembly after removing the hex-head bolt stop screw. There is no sane reason for a bolt stop on this rifle that is not finger only removable. Both guns share the identical bolt-actions and breech plug design, and are 209-fired only. There is also no reason for the " secondary safety" on either the Extreme or Elite, as the action quickly jacks out the primed red plastic jacket and immobilizes the gun. The rattle-prone secondary safety likes to engage itself on its own, and is an annoying waste of threads on these two specific models. A drop of green Loctite is the fix, which is often called " small screw threadlocker" and is low strength.
In the past, I' ve paid homage to Tony Knight, for no one can hold a modern inline muzzleloader in their hands without saying a big " thank you" to Tony Knight. When the original Knight Dual Ignition System Concept (DISC) rifle was singled out by the BATF and classified as a GCA firearm, Tony Knight took them on essentially alone. And won. All subsequent makers of 209 fired inlines have since reaped the benefits. Tony Knight, together with Del Ramsey, made the inline and saboted projectile the most popular and fastest growing segments of muzzleloading rifles in the last fifteen years.
The Knight catalog boasts that the Elite is " 1/2 pound lighter," and lists its weight at 7 lbs., 5 ounces vs. the catalog weight of the Extreme at 7 lbs., 14 ounces. According to my Lyman electronic trigger gauge, that just isn' t so. Both guns are virtually identical in weight, a touch over 8 lbs. with scope bases installed, but sans ramrods. The answer is that the Knight laminate stocks are lighter than their more substantial synthetic offerings. Additionally, the barrel weight savings is more pronounced in .45 caliber models. Finally, the beefier forked recoil lug adds weight to the barrel assembly, but in a far better place. For all intents and purposes, the .50 caliber models of the Elite and Extreme are in the same weight class, around 8 lb. guns.
I' ve not considered the Knight Extreme to be a poor-handling gun, but the Elite really shines in comparison. The tapered barrel of the Elite, which comes equipped with no iron sights, makes the Elite a beautifully weighted, neutrally balanced gun. Side by side, the Extreme is a nose heavy pig by comparison. Yes, the Elite feels " that" good: like an entirely different gun! Normally, I don' t get too terribly impressed with camo stocks. However, the Elite' s hardwoods camouflage stock is strikingly handsome: the best looking synthetic stock I' ve seen on a muzzleloader. As opposed to the laminate, the molded checkering is functional as opposed to the " for show only" stippling arrangement on the laminated example. The recoil pad is generous, and well fitted in both cases. As many can attest, stock swelling is still an issue with laminated stocks, not so with quality synthetic stocks. The real world consideration has much to do with where you live and hunt.
One thing that has always impressed me about Knight Rifles is their customer service and tech support. Both Knight and Thompson are standouts in that regard. One of the benefits of owning a Knight is that a new Knight customer can ship their trigger to Knight, and Knight Rifles will adjust it to your specifications; shipping it back to you normally within 24 hours-- NO CHARGE. They ship back to the customer the same way you ship it to them: if you " next day it," they " next day it" back. " Priority Mail" it, that' s the way it is shipped back. I asked for a 3 lb. trigger, and they came very close: a 3 lb., 3 oz. repeatable break, with almost no take-up. Easily the best trigger I' ve ever pulled on a Knight, and one of the very best on any muzzleloader I' ve fired.
The gun was outfitted with Weaver " Grand Slam" steel bases, Warne QD medium height rings, and a Bushnell Elite 3200 3 x 9 x 40mm scope. The initial sight in took two shots at 25 yards, and the third shot was on the paper at 105 laser-verified yards. As was the case with the Extreme, the Knight Elite did not handle the standard 295 grain Powerbelt HP or Aero-tip Powerbelts well at all. These best I could ever get out of the Extreme was 4-1/4" groups or so. No matter what I tried with the Elite, I could get no tighter than 3-1/4" groups. Better than ever accomplished with the Extreme, but remarkably unremarkable. So, after 7 or 8 three-shot attempts, I went to the 405 grain Powerbelts. Bingo! The groups instantly shrunk to sub 1" and stayed there. As a point of comparison, trying most every combination I could think of over several months, the Knight Extreme hit the wall at about 2" . The Knight Elite sliced that by half, first day out. Triple 7 pellets or loose powder, it made no difference. Consistent MOA groups at 105 yards became the norm, with no barrel swabbing through 100 consecutive shots. I had brought out several other rifles to test, but I was having so much fun with the Knight Elite I shot it exclusively until well after sunset.
There have been several subsequent all-day shoots. I' ve been able to shoot the " Knight Powerbelts," which feature the Knight-only 260 grain bullet weight and a slightly modified gas check. Other than those differences, they are Powerbelt Aerotips with a red nose and a black gas check. Grouping at about 1-3/4 inches, they are a substantial improvement over the standard 245 grain and 295 grain Powerbelts in this rifle, which just never made it to 3 inches. However, they are distinctly inferior to the regular CVA-marketed 348 and 405 grain Powerbelts, which have given consistent 1 inch no swab groups at 100 yards.
The Knight Elite was a good candidate for Cecil Epp' s " Dead Center" sabots, which are astonishingly good. These high ballistic coefficient (.325) orange saboted 220 grain beauties are the easiest loading sabots I' ve ever used. As a point of comparison, a 405 grain Powerbelt has a B.C. of .257. Though conventional wisdom has suggested that thicker sabots can stick to the bullet, and affect accuracy, that is not the case with Cecil' s .40 caliber bullets. The sabots quickly flower and fall away, and ended up in a neat pile approximately 30 feet from the muzzle.
Following Cecil' s instructions, a fouling shot was fired first, with one lone spit patch between shots. Through several days of testing, the Dead Centers have not failed to group ½ inch or slightly better in this rifle, making them by far the most accurate bullets I have ever used, period. With moderate 100 grain Triple Seven pellet charges, the recoil is extremely mild;;feeling similar to my old Marlin " Camp 9" 9mm. Yet, even these loads chronographed at approximately 1800 fps. We were able to push these bullets all the way up to 2300 fps, but blown sabots were the result. The Dead Centers retained this level of accuracy up to over 2100 fps before starting to drop off. Congratulations to Cecil Epp and his boys for making believers out of all of us-- " Dead Center" is exactly what they do.
The Knight Extreme that I' ve shot so hard in the past has never failed to leave a thin scope coat of residue. After all this shooting with the Elite, I was amazed that though there was certainly blowback residue in the action, there was just a small fraction of what the Knight Extreme produced. I switched from Federal to Winchester to Remington primers, but no discernable scope residue. Thinking that Knight had hardened the plastic jackets somewhat, I used the remainder of the earliest red plastic jackets I had: still, no residue. Checking with Knight, I was assured that there has been no running production change. There are cumulative tolerances here, in both plastic jacket and nipple / breechplug. Call it luck of the draw.
As for the accuracy improvement, the Knight 2003 catalog says the Elite " has a unique bedded action for added accuracy." The action is in no way bedded that I can fathom, it is a forked recoil lug lying on plastic. However, the Knight press release of December 2002 is a bit more descriptive, mentioning the new cantilevered lug, which allows the barrel to be ' nearly free-floating." The Elite' s barrel does pass the " dollar bill test," exhibiting no contact from the muzzle down to where the barrel taper ends. When you tighten down the lone recoil lug, you can watch the barrel lift up and away from the stock. So, the fork attached to the recoil lug does indeed help with its larger footprint, and I suspect that offers the primary reason for the Elite' s better accuracy. The Extreme, on the other hand, has very heavy stock contact on one side of the barrel towards the muzzle, a wide gap on the other side. This can' t help.
The Knight Disc Elite is the most accurate, best handling Knight Rifle I' ve ever fired. A true 1" shooter out of the box with 348 gr. or 405 grain Powerbelts with no swabbing, it consistently shoots ½" or better with 220 grain Dead Center sabots. The combination of the Elite and Precision Rifle' s Dead Center bullets makes this the most consistently accurate muzzleloading gun I' ve ever tested. I' m impressed with the look, feel, accuracy, trigger, and contoured barrel of the Disc Elite. The longer, forked " cantilevered recoil lug" addresses, at least in part, what I have long felt was the Knight' s primary deficiency:a barreled action flaccidly attached to the stock by one wimpy lug and screw. While unorthodox, the results seem clear enough: It brings the Knight bolt action rifle up to a whole new level. This is the first Knight I can really wax enthusiastic about. It is the finest, best handling, most accurate Knight Rifle I' ve seen. As far as I' m concerned, the Knight Disc Elite .50 caliber is easily Knight' s best effort to date, and the rifle that finally deserves to have Tony Knight' s name on the side of it. My highest recommendation.
#3
Typical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Wabash, IN
You will be VERY happy with the Knight - it' s a good piece.
My advice is to go with the .50cal. The .45 has plenty of power - just not the accuracy of the .50. You can probably find a good load for the .45, but it' ll probably be with much larger bullets & less powder than you would think on the surface. Finding a top load for the .50cal is a much quicker process due to bullet choice & availability.
Good Luck
My advice is to go with the .50cal. The .45 has plenty of power - just not the accuracy of the .50. You can probably find a good load for the .45, but it' ll probably be with much larger bullets & less powder than you would think on the surface. Finding a top load for the .50cal is a much quicker process due to bullet choice & availability.
Good Luck
#5
Also consider the Thompson/Center Omega .50cal. T/C hit it right on the money with the Omega. The Omega has almost all the traits that I want in a muzzleloader. It is very accurate, simple, reliable, virtually weatherproof, clean shooting, easy to disassemble and clean, has a good trigger; has a hammer that is made ready when about to shoot eliminating the need for redundant safeties; doesn' t require extra consumables (DISCs) or multiple tools for disassembly; the breechplug is easy to reach so there is no need for a capper/decapper, and for the quality it is very reasonably priced. The base blue/black model can be had for well under $400, with the top end models going up to the mid to upper $500' s.
I currently shoot a Knight Original DISC .50. And while I' m happy enough with the Knight to never sell it, if I were to buy a new muzzleloader today it' d definately be the Omega.
Mike
I currently shoot a Knight Original DISC .50. And while I' m happy enough with the Knight to never sell it, if I were to buy a new muzzleloader today it' d definately be the Omega.
Mike
#6
Knight does make some very nice guns , but not the best . For deer technically any ML will do if the powder and bullet are well matched to the rifle . Go with the .50 , there are far more accessories available for them . Look around some more before shopping , if you' re not looking for a legacy gun to pass down someday you may just find that the $150 Traditions or T/C at Wally World is plenty for your needs . Even the $100 cheapo can take down a deer , the rest is looks and durability .
#8
After hearing how a buddy would increase his spoeed and distance with a 45 cal and watching him splatter them all over the target and become quickly frustrated, I can easily say without reservation stick or go with the 50 cal. My inline 50 is very accurate out to 150 yards which as far as any person really needs to shoot. I have taken 1 wt doe last fall at 147 yards (rangefinder measured) and the rest have been around 50-127. All animals have went down very quickly. I am shooting 240 XTP' s with 100 grains of pyrodex (pellets) and #11 caps. Like mentioned the 50 seems much easier to develop a load that will shoot well, I have a number of pals that use 50 cal inlines and many use different powder/bullet combos with good accuracy results.
As far as manufacturer that is up to the guy paying and holding the pole to decide. So many good ones to choose from, if you buy what feels right/good to you than I can' t see their being a wrong decision.
As far as manufacturer that is up to the guy paying and holding the pole to decide. So many good ones to choose from, if you buy what feels right/good to you than I can' t see their being a wrong decision.
#9
Fork Horn
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: stuart, iowa,usa
5 guys in my group shoot knights. and after the season, we added 2 more converts. 4 original discs, 3 extremes. all .50 caliber all stainless steel. i might consider selling mine, and getting one of the new elite' s. but i will NEVER own a muzzleloader that is not a knight. this was my first attempt at blackpowder shooting, and i think i might put the shotgun on the shelf, and carry the knight durring shotgun season this year.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Semisane
Test Posts
0
09-14-2008 09:22 PM




