Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Volume Charges vs. Weighed Charges

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-21-2007 | 10:44 PM
  #1  
Semisane's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,918
Likes: 1
From: River Ridge, LA (Suburb of New Orleans)
Default Volume Charges vs. Weighed Charges

In one of my recent posts I talked about using weighed charges and getting better groups. Then I got to thinking about the possibility of someone new to muzzle loading reading that and(beingunaware of previous threads on the subject)weighing out 150 grains of Triple 7 and shooting it. That would be what is known asa bad idea.

Weighed charges must be "volume equivalent".

Shown below iswhat I get with my volume powder measure set on 100 grains andI fill the measure to overflowing, tap the sides with a pencila half dozen times to settle the powder, and then fill it level to the top again.

Weights shown are the average of weighing each type of powder three times using the fill/tap/fill method. By the way - the "tap down" settles the powder about 1/4" below the top of the measure.

100 grains volume Goex FFG = 110 grains weight.
100 grains volume Pyrodex RS = 77.5 grains weight.
100 grains volume Pyrodex Select RS = 75.5 grains weight.
100 grains Triple 7 FFG = 77.8 grains weight.
100 grains Triple 7 FFFG = 87 grains weight.

DON'T NOBODY BLOW THEMSELVES UP USING 150 GRAIN WEIGHT CHARGES!!
Semisane is offline  
Reply
Old 05-21-2007 | 11:01 PM
  #2  
cayugad's Avatar
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,193
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default RE: Volume Charges vs. Weighed Charges

An important thing to remember is re-weigh your charges each time you open a new pound of powder. What I do is say the rifle likes 80 grains of Goex 2f. I weigh five separate charges measured by volume measure set to 80 grains,to get an average weight for the charge. Then I make the rest of the weights with that ratio for that pound of powder.
cayugad is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-2007 | 06:05 AM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Volume Charges vs. Weighed Charges

ORIGINAL: Semisane

In one of my recent posts I talked about using weighed charges and getting better groups. Then I got to thinking about the possibility of someone new to muzzle loading reading that and(beingunaware of previous threads on the subject)weighing out 150 grains of Triple 7 and shooting it. That would be what is known asa bad idea.

Weighed charges must be "volume equivalent".

Shown below iswhat I get with my volume powder measure set on 100 grains andI fill the measure to overflowing, tap the sides with a pencila half dozen times to settle the powder, and then fill it level to the top again.

Weights shown are the average of weighing each type of powder three times using the fill/tap/fill method. By the way - the "tap down" settles the powder about 1/4" below the top of the measure.

100 grains volume Goex FFG = 110 grains weight.
100 grains volume Pyrodex RS = 77.5 grains weight.
100 grains volume Pyrodex Select RS = 75.5 grains weight.
100 grains Triple 7 FFG = 77.8 grains weight.
100 grains Triple 7 FFFG = 87 grains weight.

DON'T NOBODY BLOW THEMSELVES UP USING 150 GRAIN WEIGHT CHARGES!!
Just printed this to PDF, so I would have it. Thanks for putting it out.
Chap Gleason
gleason.chapman is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-2007 | 09:17 AM
  #4  
cayugad's Avatar
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,193
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default RE: Volume Charges vs. Weighed Charges

The problem with that Chap as taking Semisane's numbers and weights to heart is (and I mean no reflection on the information posted by Semisane) not all volume measure scales are made alike, and not all scales weight the same.

For instance, when I did 100 grains of Goex 2f with my volume scale and then weighed it on my digital scale, I got 103 grains weight. The Triple Se7en gave me 77.1 grains weight.

Granted all of that will be closer then further apart, but make sure you check your own volume measure, and do this each time you change to a new pound of powder. I have found a difference frompound to pound in them as well. Not much mind you, but a difference. If we are doing this for consistancy, then lets be consistant.
cayugad is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-2007 | 09:41 AM
  #5  
sabotloader's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,703
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Default RE: Volume Charges vs. Weighed Charges

Semisane

100 grains Triple 7 FFG = 77.8 grains weight.
You must have a prety decent set of scales.... 100 grains of T7-2f is suppose to weigh 77.7 grains - hence the name Triple 7

And as cayugad says it can change a bit from lot to lot - or depending on the moisture your present bottle has absorbed after it was opened...

I have never gotten into weighing charges, cause I am not shooting paper for money, and the fact that 5 grains usually makes less than 1% difference.

sabotloader is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-2007 | 10:46 AM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Volume Charges vs. Weighed Charges

ORIGINAL: cayugad

The problem with that Chap as taking Semisane's numbers and weights to heart is (and I mean no reflection on the information posted by Semisane) not all volume measure scales are made alike, and not all scales weight the same.

For instance, when I did 100 grains of Goex 2f with my volume scale and then weighed it on my digital scale, I got 103 grains weight. The Triple Se7en gave me 77.1 grains weight.

Granted all of that will be closer then further apart, but make sure you check your own volume measure, and do this each time you change to a new pound of powder. I have found a difference frompound to pound in them as well. Not much mind you, but a difference. If we are doing this for consistancy, then lets be consistant.
OK. Thanks Cayugad. Chap Gleason
gleason.chapman is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
corey012778
Black Powder
18
10-19-2008 11:35 PM
MoNoFletch
Black Powder
20
07-06-2008 04:00 PM
cayugad
Black Powder
45
08-12-2007 01:38 PM
cayugad
Black Powder
17
01-27-2007 03:10 PM
SimmsHunter
Black Powder
3
11-13-2006 08:51 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.