multiple patches
#2
Personally, if you're thinking about getting to a ball small enough not to do a lot of damage to edible parts, you'd probably have to go all the way down to a .32 and I can't imagine it would be accurate;
In addition, multiple patches may allow a ball to slip/move forward, etc.
Onesuggestion would be to sight it in with a throttled back load like 40grns of powder, and just go for head shots, or dead center in the middle so no major edible parts are damaged....I do that witha .45cal I use for squirrels
In addition, multiple patches may allow a ball to slip/move forward, etc.
Onesuggestion would be to sight it in with a throttled back load like 40grns of powder, and just go for head shots, or dead center in the middle so no major edible parts are damaged....I do that witha .45cal I use for squirrels
#3
I agree with Roundball.. if small game is on the menu, then lower the powder charge and work up a light load. No matter how small a caliber you go down to you are going to have to go for a head shot or non-meat area shot so keep the same caliber and work up a accurate light load. Head shoot them.
#4
ORIGINAL: Nanook85
I have a .54 Lyman percussion rifle. I was wondering if it was feasible/safe to use multiple patches in order to shoot a smaller ball for squirrel.
I have a .54 Lyman percussion rifle. I was wondering if it was feasible/safe to use multiple patches in order to shoot a smaller ball for squirrel.
I suggest you "bark" your squirrels, rather than try to use a ball that is too smal to be accurate. "Barking" is what D. Boone, et al did-you shoot into the tree limb or trunk just under the squiurrel. Either the shock from the close impact or the fall will kill it!




