30-06 grain for deer and elk.
#21

I prefer heavier for caliber bullets they are both better in terminal and ballistical performance down range. Forget speed at the muzzle. All said what shoots best is always the best choice, I certainly wouldn't shoot a 180 if the 165 shoot noticably better.
In terms of the accubond I have harvested moose, elk and deer with this bullet it works, not an issue to report. Good choice as long as it shoots well. JMO but using a premium type bullet is never a bad idea, especially when elk or larger game are on tap.
In terms of the accubond I have harvested moose, elk and deer with this bullet it works, not an issue to report. Good choice as long as it shoots well. JMO but using a premium type bullet is never a bad idea, especially when elk or larger game are on tap.
#23

In theory I like the 165 gr. Barnes Mrx as being my choice for best all around bullet in killing animals from the 30-06.This is what I have been using since the MRX has come out.Never have used it on deer mind you,but its what I'm using this year again, and hopefully I see a buck worth using them on.It's been 6 years since I shot a deer but I have used both the 165 and the 180 with great success in killing elk and moose.But when it comes to these super premium bullets what often works on animals that require greater penatration often pencils through animals like deer.So I dropped down in bullet weight(also lowers the bullet sectional density) in hoping that I will get better bullet performance when I shoot a deer I already know they perform on elk and moose.There are great bullets available by every manfacturer but a well constructed 165 gr bullet that has appropriate sectional density for hunting the variety of game you want is a good place to start.
Last edited by Jeff Ovington; 09-05-2010 at 12:11 PM.
#24
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kerrville, Tx. USA
Posts: 2,722

Hornady makes Superformance ammo with a 165 GMX bullet. This ammo replaces their "light magnum" line, but does the same thing: 200 fps faster with no more recoil.
Currently $32 at Midway: http://www.midwayusa.com/viewproduct...tnumber=911909
That is what I would be carrying if I were hunting for elk with a 30-06. IMO, it is the best compromise between speed and weight.
Currently $32 at Midway: http://www.midwayusa.com/viewproduct...tnumber=911909
That is what I would be carrying if I were hunting for elk with a 30-06. IMO, it is the best compromise between speed and weight.
#25
Typical Buck
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 797

I prefer 165grs. Besides you already stated you won't be taking long shots so I would say shoot whatever you rifle likes the best. Any of the mentioned bullets and loads will do the job. We as rifle hunters finally got enough selection of calibers and ammunition out there that we can finally have real opinionated debates like the bowhunter's do. Hehe
#26
Spike
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southeastern Montana
Posts: 27

I prefer 165grs. Besides you already stated you won't be taking long shots so I would say shoot whatever you rifle likes the best. Any of the mentioned bullets and loads will do the job. We as rifle hunters finally got enough selection of calibers and ammunition out there that we can finally have real opinionated debates like the bowhunter's do. Hehe
Big reason I don't use the 180's is the recoil difference.
#27

We all have diferent experiences. I always use heavy premium bullets on bull hunts (such as a NP). I have taken quartering shots at bulls that I would not have taken on a cow hunt, and I have shot bulls that were quite a bit larger than any cow that I have cleaned. The shots that I take on a cow hunt are always broadside, and probably at a closer average range.
I have shot some big bulls that were tough enough to take a well placed shot and still run down to the bottom of some hellhole before calling it quits.
It is my opinion that any good (fairly heavy for caliber) bullet traveling at .30-06 velocities will do an effective job on a calm broadside elk at reasonable ranges.
I have shot some big bulls that were tough enough to take a well placed shot and still run down to the bottom of some hellhole before calling it quits.
It is my opinion that any good (fairly heavy for caliber) bullet traveling at .30-06 velocities will do an effective job on a calm broadside elk at reasonable ranges.
Just my 2 cents.
#28

Just find the ammo that shoots and groups the best through your rifle at different distances. If it is 150 grains or greater, use it for anything. Although, if you are going to hunt elk at distances greater than 250 yards, you might find a second "go to" load in the 180 and up range.
#30
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: orygun
Posts: 379

I don't think you have to use a premium bullet for cow elk. Cows are smaller than the bulls, and you will probably be shooting reasonable ranges at undisturbed animals on a meat hunt. Your .30-06's velocity will not cause the problems with bullet construction that can happen with excessive speed. I like a 165 for this type of hunt, but a 180 would be a good choice.
are you high?