why are you pursuing this so? By doing so, it does imply (and certainly appears so) that you have taken the stance to defend Dr. Ashby's original statement. Then you say, that you aren't defending it...I believe you're confusing everyone on the board...
Really, sorry for the confusion. The only reason that I have posted multiple times was to clarify. I agree 100% that my original statements should have only been posted once. But they seemed to get disorted for some reason. The reason that I made the original post was in support to the origianl post to the topic. However, the quote that I used was said to be mine at one point, that it was taken from a paper at another and that I am defending it it in another, along with having some false accuation made against me. For some reason my point needed to clarified.
Let me explain, I claim to be no expert. However, Dr. Ashby's studies and opinions are valid to me and I do believe that a lot of work, actual testing, expertise, and education goes into a lot of his findings. Someone has proclaimed that his statements (or some) are exagerated and idiotic. Since Dr. Ashby frequently visits another forum, I am just inviting this person to have a conversation with Dr. Ashby to explain why they feel his findings (or some of) are idiotic and exagerated.
I'm really not uderstand the difficulty in understanding this. I really don't have a lot of interest in defending Dr. Ashby's points especially when he can do so for himself. However, I do have interest in defending what I posted especially when it gets distorted.
Well, I tried to be as clear as I could, so this will be it for me.
Good Hunting to everyone!