I tried to reason with you and I even suggested that Ashby might have been exagerating to make a point but no you had your quote and it wasn't possible in your mind that it could be wrong. Well Ashby's published paper shows you were wrong to defend what absolutely was an exageration at least and yes idotic at worst.
No, it's like I keep saying to you, if you believe it to be idiotic, go and tell the man himself instead of calling his statements exagerated and idiotic (I'm feeling like a broken record). It is possible. Why proclaim to people the Dr. Ashby's finding and statements (or some of them) are idiotic and exagerated when you can tell him yourself. Thats the only point that I'm trying to make.
I said it was wrong and YOU jumped all over me defending it.
Why are you saying I am defending it. I don't see that. I just reread my posts. Maybe you could elaborate. FWIW, I do believe he is the expert in the area.
First of all, you have no idea how much of an expert I may be in this area.
Sorry, I just kind of assumed that you did less testing in the area then Dr. Ashby. Maybe I was wrong.