Here is the part that gets me.
The young adult dog, tentatively named Easton after the brand of hunting arrow, was originally reported to McKinley County animal control officers at about 8:30 a.m. on Friday as a stray.
Notice the careful wording the author used in their article.
Easton after the brand of hunting arrow
Again
Why did it have to be a hunting arrow, Easton makes alot of arrows.
Most of which are classified as just that---Arrows.
The term "Hunting" thrown in there is what is the little key that turns people reading the article off.
The average Joe would not even think that there are shooters of bows that never hunt just as there are hunters that do not shoot bows.
Articles like that are what turn me off to the un-educated authors. Little hits like that to us only fuels the fire on the "slow burn" basis.
The author could have driven the point of the article by just simply saying the dog was named "Easton" after the brand of arrow.
From the picture and the article and position of the arrow, with it being plainly written in the article it appears that it was an arrow tipped with a field point, Surely not a "hunting" set up.