Show me a hunter who believes we had a BD ratio of 1:2.1 or even 1:2.4 in 01 and I'll show you a guy who thinks Bill Clinton didn't lie!
Whether hunters believe it or not is irrelevant. The simple fact is when 91% of the adult doe are being bred and the vast majority are producing twins, it is simply impossible to have a B/D ratio of greater than 1:3. Just because you can't comprhend simple biology and basic third grade math doesn't mean it isn't true.
Once again you crunch the numbers to suit you. You yourself have refused to believe the ow deer number you hjust cited and we were killing 85-90% of all adult bucks not 70% before AR
Wrong again. I belived the OWDD of 1M deer in 2001 ,but what I questioned was the 8% herd reduction caused by the 2001 anterless harvest which was less than the 2000 anterless harvest.
I never questioned that we harvest 80% of our 1.5 buck or 80 % of our PS buck pror to AR.
Now I have a riddle for you. Let's say an archer sees 5 antlered buck from the same stand during archery season and can identify them by the number of points and shape of their racks. During the same period he sees 30 adult doe. How does the archer know how many of the adult doe he saw more than once?