1994 157,030 238,051
1995 182,235 248,348
1996 153,432 197,565
1997 176,677 220,339 tags 797,000 used 745,000
1998 181,449 196,040 tags 797,000 used 745,000
1999 194,368 184,224 tags 890,000 used ?
2000 203,221 301,379 tags 830,650 used 828,000
2001 203,247 282,767 tags 780,250 concurrent season
2002 165,416 352,113 tags 1,029,350.
2003 142,270 322,620 tags 1,040,000
when you have low tag allocations you will have a high antlered harvest follow
when you have a high tag alloc. you will have a lower antlered harvest follow
So let me get this straight. If the tag allocations are really low than the following year the anter harvest will be really high because there are more doe popping out deer and vice versa. That means with tag allocations being at an 8 year low in 2001 then we should have had a he// of a year in 2002. Oh wait...we didn't. Your proof positive explanation and data sure make your argument rock solid
.