HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Inconsistency or Double Standards?
View Single Post
Old 05-12-2004 | 09:06 PM
  #8  
ampahunter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
From: Brampton Ontario Canada
Default RE: Inconsistency or Double Standards?

Matt/PA--my point is, Wolf Dog has done nothing 'different' to what others and myself have done in the past.
I would recommend you take a look at his thread--- if you can.
The guy shared with us, the members and visitors of this board, results of a 'AWESOME Broadhead' (as HE terms it) and went on to provide a link.

I definitely understand what you mean about advertising on the board---but correct me if I am wrong--haven't the owners and manufactures of other archery accessories posted threads here that promotes their products?
Were not these threads remained accessible to all---fortunately!!!

For example---with all 'respect' to you---take a look at your 'profile photo'--would you not consider that as 'promotional' and a 'form of advertising'?

Sharing information about products and results of field testing in 'my books' would be considered fair game, but of course I am not a moderator, neither am I part of the directors of this board.
I am just 'expressing' my respectful opinion and in doing so, questioning the consistency and standards as to 'why' some manufactures can discuss their products here and others aren't given that privilege.
Getting on the board and saying--'Here guys, a awesome broadhead--on sale at John Buck for $25. a pack of three'-- this is advertising. JMHO.

Maybe I am not getting this, but in my opinion I see nothing wrong with anyone for that matter hailing a product--be it their own or not. An individual sharing information with us and giving us the opportunity to learn about new products, would also promote this board, as I am sure others would welcome the fact that they could come to the board (HBBS) and gain further knowledge of products out there that we are not yet aware of.
Just my humble opinion.
ampahunter is offline  
Reply