Inconsistency or Double Standards?
First, let me begin by saying I have absolutely 'no intention' of starting a fire, but as a member of this board I am given the privilege to address threads, once I keep within the constraints and rules of the board.
Recently a member, Wolf Dog, (with whom I have no connection) posted a thread, subject, "Awesome Broadhead" and during the course of the day the authorities locked the thread, then someone made comment of posting a thread as a non-paying advertiser.
In my opinion, Wolf Dog gave us an account of the game killed with this broadhead, he made mention of several hunts, I think 'four in total' and in the end gave us information of where we can gather further knowlwdge of this broadhead---I personally see 'nothing wrong' with this thread and in my opinion, do not see the necessity for locking his thread.JMO.
I have in the past participated in several other threads on this board that spoke of bows, portable bow presses, stabilizers, arrow wraps, tree stands, clothing (ASAT) etc, etc--- just to name a few, and fortunately as it was, those threads were not locked. Hopefully I was not guilty of being a non-paying advertiser and this is not my intention.
I am here so I could learn of the new accessories and stuff coming into the archery world and also the historic pass of archery, and so on.
I am here to share any information I may have with others and visa versa.
IMO this is what Wolf Dog wanted to do, this is how we learn of what's hot and what's not--what works and what dosen't.
I am certainly NOT trying to change the rules here, but just wanted to express my humble opinion of what "I feel" isn't right and could be seen as inconsistencies and or favor/bias.
As I said, let's keep this clean, let's play by the rules--but let us also share whatever information we have gathered on our archery equipment for others to see and use their own initiative to decide what works for themselves.
JMHO.