RE: A challenge to the Alt naysayers
Ok here's my (just mine) response
1 Woul leave even fewer hunters. Bad for our cause on the political front
2 Been done, AR won!
3 I AGREE, I hope it happens with time
4 Maybe a good idea in selected spots, but how would it be accomplished with existing manpower and resources.
5 unnecessary but if it happened, you don't trust the PGC, would you trust someone they hired
6 One I totally agree with. I've hunted other states and all of them had mandatory check stations
Some problems with your solutions. They are completely one sided in terms of who they serve. Your plan seems oriented toward one thing more deer. That doesn't even serve the majortiy of hunters. Not to mention the fact that you've ignored the interests of property owners who feed the herd and provide cover.