yes that is eaxctly what i am saying.game laws do not fall under enforcement by police offocers. they can hold til a game warden arrives.it is a entirely seperate branch of the law.the reason you could not prosecute is that it would show bias in the enforcement.they both broke the law.one is not worse than the other.waiy a minute. you say you have seen a officer arrest some for a game violation and then the next minute you say at least hold them for a game officer.which is it?if you see a deer being shot illegally you can only hold them until a game officer arrives and files the case. you will be used as a witness to the offense.if both people shot a deer illegally you either have to enforce both or ignore both.you can not let one go and enforce the other. it shows bias and will not be prosecuted