HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Why is a lever job associated with deep-woods hunting?
Old 04-10-2019 | 01:39 PM
  #5  
Dave_Preston's Avatar
Dave_Preston
Spike
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Default

Originally Posted by hunters_life
There is also the looks factor as well. What I mean by that is, most leverguns, at least a couple of decades ago anyway, were a good deal less expensive than a good bolt action thereby leverguns were being called "brush guns". Now there are some out there that are under the illusion that being a brush gun was caliber/cartridge driven. They thought that the leverguns were chambered with big heavy bullets that would "go through brush" better than your fast movers. They were actually called brush guns because most didn't mind taking that much less expensive lever gun into thick cover and getting it a little scratched up. Most of your good bolt actions back then tended to have fine looking wood stocks and you didn't want to get it dinged up. It had absolutely nothing to do with cartridge/bullet. A tiny unseen limb will throw a big 30+ caliber bullet off track just about as easily as it will a .243.
I find the bolt-action guns sleek, pretty and racy. For me, getting the rifle sighted in at the bench and making the first shot count is of the essence. The bolt-action can fire these sleek, bottleneck high-velocity cartridges and they are stacked in the magazine in a column not single-file in a tube so they can handle a wide variety of bullet types. I find lever guns ungainly to look at to boot and feel pumps are shotguns, not rifles. It has been said that the bolt-action is a true rifleman's rifle and for me most aesthetically pleasing in the field. A lever gun is a Ford Focus but a Weatherby Vanguard bolt-action is a slick sports car.
Dave_Preston is offline  
Reply