He is just a talking head . For example his latest article , while informative and interesting definitely has an agenda .
Article here :http://namlhunt.com/knight52caliber-2.html
A quote from that article that shows he is incorrect :

You would think that the folks at Knight Rifles would have learned from other rifle makers' mistakes. Years ago, the White Rifles line did indeed have a chance to become a major player in the modern in-line muzzleloader market ... and the company built some fine rifles. What kind of killed that line was ... you had to shoot their bullets ... since the bores of their rifles were purposely built a bit over size. Their .45 was .451 caliber, their .50 was .502 caliber. So, for most shooters across the country, to shoot these rifles meant ordering their bullets from White Rifles. One COULD NOT walk into just about any gun shop and pick up some fodder for those rifles

White was not .502 they are .504 and that is not what killed White as a company . Gee Toby get your facts straight . But there is an agenda