I've done a ton of research, and I've while the Ruger American Predator used to be at the top of my list, I got to hold one and I can't stand the stalk. Seems so flexible that it could touch the barrel off of a bipod. If I'm wrong let me know, but I just have a tough time getting past that. So I've narrowed it down to two guns that both have sub MOA guarantees - The Weatherby Vanguard S2 and the Bergara B14 Hunter. I'm really leaning toward the hunter because I had originally wanted a Remington 700 but heard some bad things about the trigger and the fact that the barrel wasn't free floated. From my research it sounds like the Bergara accepts almost all Remington 700 part upgrades, and they've also free floated the barrel and the trigger is Bergara's and is supposed to be better than the stock 700. I can get the Bergara for $640 or the Weatherby for roughly $500. Is the Bergara worth the extra $140? I've heard nothing but good things about the Weatherby, but it does not have a free floated barrel and I worry that it could be more susceptible to changing weather conditions. That said, I'm new to rifles above the quality of walmart brands, so I don't know whether or not a floated barrel is necessary if it already shoots sub MOA. My main goal is to find a rifle I can use for a long time to hunt, but also to shoot long range (we're building about a 900 yd range now). I'd like to do it right the first time, but also not spend a ton of money upfront. I plan to put a Nikon Black X1000 xMOA scope on either one. Opinions from anyone who knows more than I do about these guns? (everyone!)
