Hardly!!! My logic does hold water and is genuine. I dont think that psuedo logic is an achievable state of existance. Due to the fact that logic cannot be deceiving.

I dont think you could prove my logic wrong if you tried.

Premise 1 : A set of principles of right conduct. = Ethics
Premise 2 : Wounding a deer is not illegal in NY State
Premise 3 : A person can wound a deer by hunting in any fashion legally allowed.
Premise 4 : Ethics vary from person to person.
Premise 5 : A person can ethically wound a deer by using any legal implement they wish as long as it is within the parameters of what they or their gruop deem ethically eacceptable.

IF 1 & 2 & 3 & 4, Then 5

Prove that statement wrong logically. I dont want your opinionated and unsupported rhetoric.
I feel that these premises are fair and accurate repesentations of this situation. Please create a logical statement that negates my claims. If you refute the premises I listed please explain why.
And before you refute the the part about ethics being relative please read this http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/L...93/ethics.html