Ok, I' m not trying to step on anyone' s toes, but I sometimes find it funny the way some people think...kind of along these lines: I' m sure we' ve all heard the story about the woman interviewing an armory sgt. about a ' recent' kid' s shooting program...she asked, " isn' t teaching kids to shoot equipping them to be killers" , he responded, " you' re equipped to be a prostitute, but you' re not are you?"

The other day in the lab, a buddy and I were talking about what we' d like to have for dinner, it ran on that he didn' t really like meat, not on principle, just on taste=respectable, then this gal that we work with came over and claimed " I could never eat anything with four legs" , so I asked, " why not, and what would you eat?" she replied " because dogs and cats have four legs, so it' s like eating a dog or cat to eat a cow, pig, or sheep, but I' ll eat things with two legs, like chicken poultry" .....ok, I guess she missed the fact that HUMANS have two legs!!!!!

I reiterate, I' m not meaning to step on any toes, but it surely falls under this category " What was the SKS made for?" - in context to imply that it was made only to kill people...lest we forget that countless other arms, catridges, and other miscellaneous items were created with killing people in mind...and again, by owning an SKS (or any other gun) I may be equipped to be a killer, but I' m not a prostitute either.

I' m forgetting a lot of others that I' ve heard, but these are what are fresher to memory...any of yall have any?