Originally Posted by Nomercy448

Personally, I think it's very hard to choose between such different rifles, but here are my thoughts...

1) T/C is new to this bolt action rifle thing. Not necessarily a bad thing, since they could have learned a lot from seeing what OTHERS did, but on the other hand, there's usually a learning curve for any new manufacturer. The Ruger No.1 is a time tested design. Favor: Ruger.

2) A single shot rifle, no matter how fast you practice, it's still slower, and more apt to fumble than a repeater. It also means you're carrying ammo separately, which leaves you more apt to forget it, or lose it while trekking in elk country. Favor: T/C.

3) For the design, the Ruger is heavy, 1/4lb heavier than the Icon in fact. No, it's not "heavy", but for a single shot, it's pretty weighty, but then again, it's a real rifle, not a break action abomination. It's not a major consideration, but it IS a heavy single shot. Some people still follow the "heavy is good" mantra, since it means it's made from quality materials, but you still have to carry it. Favor: Neither (same weight).

4) The T/C is cheaper, about $100-150 cheaper in fact. Favor: T/C.

5) The No.1 has a finer finish (from the Icon's I've seen at least). Favor: Ruger.

6) The "It-Factor". I love Rugers, and I absolutely love Ruger No.1's (I've owned several over the years, still holding onto 3 of them). Favor: Ruger.

So my money would get spent on the Ruger. But maybe you weight the above values differently than I do.