Originally Posted by cayugad

While this I am sure this is upsetting to many, we need to remember... States make their laws according to what they feel best for the State, the wildlife, and the economy. Even if they are totally wrong as is most cases. Our governmental agencies that deal with wildlife management and laws affecting how things are run, are often administrated by pencil pushers and highly educated individuals who understand very little about key components of hunting in general. Some political action group tells them BlackHorn209 is an illegal or an unfair powder and so they react. Many times, completely ignoring the facts of the actual allegations.

Hunters all over need to write the game management administrations of these states, and explain to they why they feel the banishment of BlackHorn 209 is wrong. If they so feel that way. Also what this banishment will do in their decision to hunt in their state.

When fish and game regulators see or begin to feel their pocket book threatened, they normally tend to look into matters a little more closely and then base their decisions on hard facts instead of suspected allegations.