The Nikon Monarch would certainly be my choice. I really like the Monarchs. I've had a couple of them and they seem durable, they have pretty decent glass, and they seem to track perfectly. I really like them. The glass isn't spectacular in them, but it's more than good enough, and the rest of the scope more than makes up for the glass imo. There are other good options out there too. I'd see if you can find a Conquest with a reticle for you. It really is a lot nicer. The Vortex Vipers are another one to check out.

What's your budget? We can probably make more suggestions if we know what your budget is.

I also want to mention that you will get a ton of recommendations for Leupold on here for some reason. However, if you go to many of the other forums you will quickly realize that at this point in time, Leupolds are very overpriced for what they are, and seem to have more issues than they should especially for the price. I'd check out SnipersHide.com, Opticstalk.com, 24hourcampfire.com, etc. and talk to people that do more with their scope than just sighting it in and occasionally hunting with it.

That being said, Leupold seems to be halfway realizing that they need to make some serious product line changes, but it's just starting to happen and at this point and time, I just don't feel they are the way to go.

As for the Bushnell, I've never had that particular one, but I've used a couple of their Elite scopes, and while they have had good glass and been decent, I've just never been a big fan of them. They are still a Bushnell, and that shows imo. The tactical models I've had have been pretty decent, but you still get stuck with Bushnell's horrible customer service. Their regular non tactical models have good glass, but they just don't seem to track very well at all or at least the ones I've seen haven't.