If that is true. You may be a constitution expert and lawyer. I am not. Why did the judge of the federal district court claim lack of subject matter jurisdiction? Please teach us something.

Why did the ATF send out warnings to every FFL holder in the state of Montana? If what you say is true, there would be no need. Again, show us the way.

Then was there a need for the lawsuit period? And just to make it clear to fritz, the judge dismissed the lawsuit filed by MSSA and Gary Marbut. Not the other way around numbnuts. Look it up. So again, what are you freakin talking about fritz???

I know if I know I am in the right and operating under the law of the land, I am going to do what I want within the law. I am not going to file a lawsuit to make sure. Why is the MSSA even bothering to appeal?

If what you say is true, how are all these state laws all over our land being overturned in federal court?

Hey listen, I am all for state rights. But wishing doesn't make it so. Thats a fantasy land.

Plaintiffs filed suit in support of the law, in federal district court, on October 1, 2009. These plaintiffs are the Montana Shooting Sports Association, the Second Amendment Foundation, and MSSA president Gary Marbut. The legal complaint states that Marbut "wishes to manufacture and sell small arms and small arms ammunition to customers exclusively in Montana, pursuant to the MFFA, without complying with the NFA or the GCA, or other applicable federal laws."

On September 29, 2010, U.S. District Court Judge Donald Molloy dismissed the suit "for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim."[13]