Originally Posted by
fritz1
Yes it has., Just maybe you need to do a little more research. I know people in Montana that has no problem buying them, no matter what your opinion maybe, it doesnt change the laws in Montana. THAT IS A FACT!!!!!!! I am getting out of this pointless arguement, because as always we have another internet expert here that knows better. Sorry for getting off the subject!
Ok, show us where it was challenged and upheld in the US Sepreme court. You have succeeded in outdoing hometheaterman on here for non-sense.
Check out ATF's response
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montana...t#ATF_response
ATF responseOn July 16, 2009, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives published an open letter to Montana Federal Firearms Licensees, clarifying the bureau's position on the Montana Firearms Freedom Act. According to this letter, "...because the Act conflicts with Federal firearms laws and regulations, Federal law supersedes the Act, and all provisions of the Gun Control Act and the National Firearms Act, and their corresponding regulations, continue to apply." The letter then summarizes ATF requirements for FFL holders.[6]