HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - The Anti-BH209
Thread: The Anti-BH209
View Single Post
Old 12-13-2010 | 07:29 AM
  #27  
SJAdventures
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
From:
Default

Originally Posted by Breechplug
I have'nt nor will I ever use BH, why, because what I use works and works well. To me it seems many (and Im not dissing anyone who uses it) use it because they want the easy way out of shooting a MLer. For me a MLer has to be cleaned, swabbed and taken care of. If I do this then there's no problems. Mabey im Old fashioned but I still dont need a Powder that makes it easier to do the things that are easy to do anyway with just a small amount of more time.
If you get Corrosion in your MLer, it's your own fault not the Powders, if you have to Swab Between Shots, so what did it break your arm, and if the BH did'nt Ignite and you lost a chance at a Good Buck, Oh well at least you did'nt have to Swab between shots and worry less about cleaning and corrosion.
For me BH's advantages dont overcome it's disadvantages when you really think about it, you may gain one thing but lose more.
(BP)
I assume then (and I am not dissing you over this) that you walk to work instead of driving, wash your clothes down at the river instead of using a machine, shoot a flintlock instead of an inline? If it will work just as good for you or in some's cases even better why wouldn't a person use it. If I have two or more products that will work for me but one of those products makes it easier on me then you can bet I am using the easier one. If your not dedicated enough to do everything aspect of your life the hard way and not use anything that makes doing anything easier then why just MLing? Just my humble view of your post. I mean I could care less if you ever try BH209 so nothing personal.
SJAdventures is offline  
Reply