Originally Posted by
bluebird2
Instead of attacking Eveland's character ,why don't you refute what he had to say about the involvement of the Audubon, DCNR, the timber industry, SCS , QDMA and WMI? If you and others would have questioned Alt's character as much as you are questioning Eveland's,maybe we wouldn't be in the mess we are today.Instead you defended him and his plan for years until the overwhelming data proved he was dead wrong.
I never attacked his character.I'm saying that there's no evidence to point to who he claims to be.When people make such outlandish claims,I have no need to listen to any of the nensense they have to say.
I never denied that the Audubon,timber industry or DCNR wanted less deer.They were always very vocal about it but that doesn't mean they were wrong.